From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
To: "Kandpal, Suraj" <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>,
"intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org"
<intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
"intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org" <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 4/3] drm/i915/hdcp: Make some functions static
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2025 14:12:27 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87frkm3sno.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <SN7PR11MB6750584D241F8AF605F4927EE3F12@SN7PR11MB6750.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
On Fri, 07 Feb 2025, "Kandpal, Suraj" <suraj.kandpal@intel.com> wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Nikula, Jani <jani.nikula@intel.com>
>> Sent: Friday, February 7, 2025 4:29 PM
>> To: Nikula, Jani <jani.nikula@intel.com>; intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org;
>> intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
>> Cc: Kandpal, Suraj <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
>> Subject: [PATCH 4/3] drm/i915/hdcp: Make some functions static
>
> What happened here wrong serial number the patch itself looks okay maybe a refloat is required otherwise ci may not test it
I first sent 3 patches, and then sent the extra fourth one afterwards as
4/3. ;)
CI coped with it just fine [1].
[1] https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_144491v1/git-log-oneline.txt
> LGTM,
> Reviewed-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Thanks for the review, series pushed to drm-intel-next.
BR,
Jani.
>
>>
>> With the debugfs implementation moved next to the implementation, we no
>> longer need to expose some of the functions. Make them static.
>>
>> Cc: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hdcp.c | 10 +++++-----
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hdcp.h | 6 ------
>> 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hdcp.c
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hdcp.c
>> index 3d83db793baf..1aa4c0fd216f 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hdcp.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hdcp.c
>> @@ -209,7 +209,7 @@ int intel_hdcp_read_valid_bksv(struct
>> intel_digital_port *dig_port, }
>>
>> /* Is HDCP1.4 capable on Platform and Sink */ -bool
>> intel_hdcp_get_capability(struct intel_connector *connector)
>> +static bool intel_hdcp_get_capability(struct intel_connector
>> +*connector)
>> {
>> struct intel_digital_port *dig_port;
>> const struct intel_hdcp_shim *shim = connector->hdcp.shim; @@ -
>> 265,7 +265,7 @@ static bool intel_hdcp2_prerequisite(struct
>> intel_connector *connector) }
>>
>> /* Is HDCP2.2 capable on Platform and Sink */ -bool
>> intel_hdcp2_get_capability(struct intel_connector *connector)
>> +static bool intel_hdcp2_get_capability(struct intel_connector
>> +*connector)
>> {
>> struct intel_hdcp *hdcp = &connector->hdcp;
>> bool capable = false;
>> @@ -279,9 +279,9 @@ bool intel_hdcp2_get_capability(struct
>> intel_connector *connector)
>> return capable;
>> }
>>
>> -void intel_hdcp_get_remote_capability(struct intel_connector *connector,
>> - bool *hdcp_capable,
>> - bool *hdcp2_capable)
>> +static void intel_hdcp_get_remote_capability(struct intel_connector
>> *connector,
>> + bool *hdcp_capable,
>> + bool *hdcp2_capable)
>> {
>> struct intel_hdcp *hdcp = &connector->hdcp;
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hdcp.h
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hdcp.h
>> index 76bd3996f636..3a7905551051 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hdcp.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hdcp.h
>> @@ -21,7 +21,6 @@ struct intel_encoder;
>> struct intel_hdcp_shim;
>> struct seq_file;
>> enum port;
>> -enum transcoder;
>>
>> void intel_hdcp_atomic_check(struct drm_connector *connector,
>> struct drm_connector_state *old_state, @@ -
>> 39,11 +38,6 @@ void intel_hdcp_update_pipe(struct intel_atomic_state
>> *state,
>> const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
>> const struct drm_connector_state *conn_state);
>> bool is_hdcp_supported(struct intel_display *display, enum port port); -
>> bool intel_hdcp_get_capability(struct intel_connector *connector); -bool
>> intel_hdcp2_get_capability(struct intel_connector *connector); -void
>> intel_hdcp_get_remote_capability(struct intel_connector *connector,
>> - bool *hdcp_capable,
>> - bool *hdcp2_capable);
>> void intel_hdcp_component_init(struct intel_display *display); void
>> intel_hdcp_component_fini(struct intel_display *display); void
>> intel_hdcp_cleanup(struct intel_connector *connector);
>> --
>> 2.39.5
>
--
Jani Nikula, Intel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-10 12:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-07 10:41 [PATCH 0/3] drm/i915/hdcp: move hdcp debugfs to intel_hdcp.c, cleanups Jani Nikula
2025-02-07 10:41 ` [PATCH 1/3] drm/i915/hdcp: Move HDCP debugfs to intel_hdcp.c Jani Nikula
2025-02-07 15:52 ` Kandpal, Suraj
2025-02-07 10:41 ` [PATCH 2/3] drm/i915/hdcp: rename intel_connector to connector Jani Nikula
2025-02-07 15:42 ` Kandpal, Suraj
2025-02-07 10:41 ` [PATCH 3/3] drm/i915/hdcp: Convert platform checks to use display->platform Jani Nikula
2025-02-07 15:55 ` Kandpal, Suraj
2025-02-07 10:58 ` [PATCH 4/3] drm/i915/hdcp: Make some functions static Jani Nikula
2025-02-07 15:58 ` Kandpal, Suraj
2025-02-10 12:12 ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2025-02-07 12:42 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for drm/i915/hdcp: move hdcp debugfs to intel_hdcp.c, cleanups Patchwork
2025-02-07 12:43 ` ✓ CI.checkpatch: " Patchwork
2025-02-07 12:44 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: " Patchwork
2025-02-07 13:01 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2025-02-07 13:03 ` ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2025-02-07 13:04 ` ✓ CI.checksparse: " Patchwork
2025-02-07 13:40 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2025-02-07 19:10 ` ✓ i915.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2025-02-07 20:09 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork
2025-02-08 6:51 ` ✗ i915.CI.Full: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87frkm3sno.fsf@intel.com \
--to=jani.nikula@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=suraj.kandpal@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.