From: "Alex Bennée" <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
To: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Tyrone Ting <kfting@nuvoton.com>,
Hao Wu <wuhaotsh@google.com>,
qemu-arm@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tests/qtest/npcm7xx_watchdog_timer: Only test the corner cases by default
Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2024 11:45:10 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87fryykegp.fsf@draig.linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cfdbf6d2-404c-4a63-9ee6-24f3d12d8a59@redhat.com> (Thomas Huth's message of "Mon, 15 Jan 2024 12:36:54 +0100")
Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com> writes:
> On 15/01/2024 12.32, Alex Bennée wrote:
>> Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com> writes:
>>
>>> The test_prescaler() part in the npcm7xx_watchdog_timer test is quite
>>> repetive, testing all possible combinations of the WTCLK and WTIS
>>> bitfields. Since each test spins up a new instance of QEMU, this is
>>> rather an expensive test, especially on loaded host systems.
>> I'm not against the change but I do not my home machine runs these
>> tests
>> in:
>> 1/1 qemu:qtest+qtest-arm / qtest-arm/npcm7xx_timer-test OK
>> 0.18s 180 subtests passed
>
> That's a different test, I think. Look for "watchdog" in its name,
> please.
Ahh -ETOOMANYNPCMS...
So yes I get a drop in time by half:
1/1 qemu:qtest+qtest-arm / qtest-arm/npcm7xx_watchdog_timer-test OK 10.35s 15 subtests passed
to
1/1 qemu:qtest+qtest-arm / qtest-arm/npcm7xx_watchdog_timer-test OK 4.68s 15 subtests passed
Reviewed-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
>> so I do wonder how the system load can cause such a dramatic increase
>> for a comparatively simple test.
>
> The watchdog test is executing a new QEMU instance for each test in
> the loop, and that can be quite expensive on a loaded system, I think.
>
> Thomas
--
Alex Bennée
Virtualisation Tech Lead @ Linaro
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-15 11:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-15 7:02 [PATCH] tests/qtest/npcm7xx_watchdog_timer: Only test the corner cases by default Thomas Huth
2024-01-15 11:07 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2024-01-15 11:32 ` Alex Bennée
2024-01-15 11:36 ` Thomas Huth
2024-01-15 11:45 ` Alex Bennée [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87fryykegp.fsf@draig.linaro.org \
--to=alex.bennee@linaro.org \
--cc=kfting@nuvoton.com \
--cc=qemu-arm@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
--cc=wuhaotsh@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.