From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from galois.linutronix.de (Galois.linutronix.de [193.142.43.55]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8CB9C136A for ; Tue, 13 Jun 2023 20:12:19 +0000 (UTC) From: Thomas Gleixner DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1686686575; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=VU+jdwZmPTfrzjd0/enC6H7nGe+HOQcMgB70lKmwgx8=; b=xXZ3mEPUjx0rIWDf1HLke99wDvwrPU/fzV1dV4B5kjMm3THv8UNCXcUsB1JviLZjpnPLt4 YmPyiiJrNPlwLJo0LGBNLoJmwzEQU+GwHSztWm7V63and3MhZmNLjxXIG+wOeWX1rWH8tL XdFfB4O8tLN8c9z1orXgJVn8Oke/wVe8TPg1taBTmwz+creWCAQG5nVXvM2vGdVwZ8DirK IxjUHg55kcIsgV1Lvq/R5V8jGk1qdHllZgzpHYAtixIkrDNujs75zdK/rN67f9KkDZsccB KrVmjCem05zAFPTtDBJIkZeCltBKLzrv/48I8yHT6uC4X+ckwIhaEcqw3eNoOw== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1686686575; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=VU+jdwZmPTfrzjd0/enC6H7nGe+HOQcMgB70lKmwgx8=; b=KSHFsO3FSu9JU+HUS6u0Dd/DRLV+DN+4FhugBE07I9DENvDmJZBLW8i9e15oxPc0d/mWsG tGkRo6F19HtPJ3Cw== To: kernel test robot Cc: oe-lkp@lists.linux.dev, lkp@intel.com, oliver.sang@intel.com, Anna-Maria Behnsen Subject: Re: [tglx-devel:timers/pushpull] [timer] 8812eeb818: kernel-selftests.net.pmtu.sh.ipv6_cleanup_of_cached_exceptions_-_nexthop_objects.fail In-Reply-To: <202306132111.c5d146bf-oliver.sang@intel.com> References: <202306132111.c5d146bf-oliver.sang@intel.com> Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2023 22:02:54 +0200 Message-ID: <87fs6v5dw1.ffs@tglx> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: oe-lkp@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain On Tue, Jun 13 2023 at 22:23, kernel test robot wrote: > kind of hard for us to connect the code change with the test failure, so we > run it more times, the issue doesn't always happen on this commit, but with > a not small rate. at the same time, parent keeps clean. Weird. We'll have look. Thanks, tglx