From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2B0FEC43334 for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2022 12:35:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:37632 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1o3d6c-0000Qj-O7 for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Tue, 21 Jun 2022 08:35:42 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:49792) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1o3d5e-0007zW-FY for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 21 Jun 2022 08:34:42 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([170.10.133.124]:54227) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1o3d5a-0001Q2-QN for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 21 Jun 2022 08:34:40 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1655814877; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=uZaMgpqsrylzrmhJeWjIdOBq+mTgIExx9dUJ0C+bryo=; b=L7SKcbCY/1CYu6SxR2gUCkJL7KuftbmKxGjxQ8tABwxDc/qdeiqaIFTO17JVg+j+mEs98t 9FEBR4drtKTWIpe3mAdAFTfXg6j5F0M6Bt7aXZ8eI/rwWo9v15p5oZBa+5ALQP/bisNbQq FrJfz8iojVHWIRqPUWGpv/Q6QFnsXiA= Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mx3-rdu2.redhat.com [66.187.233.73]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-154-5NOz2PxMNy2Zqy0BjkvKgA-1; Tue, 21 Jun 2022 08:34:35 -0400 X-MC-Unique: 5NOz2PxMNy2Zqy0BjkvKgA-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 71E133C0D86B; Tue, 21 Jun 2022 12:34:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from blackfin.pond.sub.org (unknown [10.39.195.112]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 37145404E4DF; Tue, 21 Jun 2022 12:34:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: by blackfin.pond.sub.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id C493921E688E; Tue, 21 Jun 2022 14:34:33 +0200 (CEST) From: Markus Armbruster To: Leonardo Bras Cc: Daniel P. =?utf-8?Q?Berrang=C3=A9?= , Juan Quintela , "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" , Eric Blake , Peter Xu , =?utf-8?B?5b6Q6Zev?= , qemu-devel@nongnu.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/4] migration: Change zero_copy_send from migration parameter to migration capability References: <20220620053944.257547-1-leobras@redhat.com> <20220620053944.257547-5-leobras@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2022 14:34:33 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20220620053944.257547-5-leobras@redhat.com> (Leonardo Bras's message of "Mon, 20 Jun 2022 02:39:45 -0300") Message-ID: <87fsjyry92.fsf@pond.sub.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.84 on 10.11.54.2 Received-SPF: pass client-ip=170.10.133.124; envelope-from=armbru@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com X-Spam_score_int: -28 X-Spam_score: -2.9 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.082, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" Leonardo Bras writes: > When originally implemented, zero_copy_send was designed as a Migration > paramenter. > > But taking into account how is that supposed to work, and how > the difference between a capability and a parameter, it only makes sense > that zero-copy-send would work better as a capability. > > Taking into account how recently the change got merged, it was decided > that it's still time to make it right, and convert zero_copy_send into > a Migration capability. > > Signed-off-by: Leonardo Bras QAPI schema Acked-by: Markus Armbruster