All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, x86@kernel.org
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 0/2] x86/apic: Avoid cm->allocated going negative in irq_matrix
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2021 11:19:04 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87ft129enb.fsf@vitty.brq.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210219113101.967508-1-vkuznets@redhat.com>

Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com> writes:

> I discovered that CPU0 offlining/onlining works only once:
>
>      # echo 0 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/online
>      # echo 1 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/online
>      # echo 0 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/online
>      -bash: echo: write error: No space left on device
>     
>     with the following in dmesg:
>     
>      [ ... ] CPU 0 has 4294967295 vectors, 589 available. Cannot disable CPU
>
> And the problem seems to be that irq_matrix_assign()/irq_matrix_free() calls
> for PIC_CASCADE_IR are unbalanced, making cm->allocated go negative.
>
> RFC as I didn't quite get why we're making an exception for PIC_CASCADE_IR in
> the first place. Surely it is special, but for the sake of consistency we'd
> better not treat it as such. Or maybe I just misunderstood everything.
>

If the RFC part is the only thing which scares everyone off I'm ready to
drop it and pretend that I'm confident with the change)

> Vitaly Kuznetsov (2):
>   x86/apic: Do not make an exception for PIC_CASCADE_IR when marking
>     legacy irqs in irq_matrix
>   genirq/matrix: WARN_ON_ONCE() when cm->allocated/m->total_allocated go
>     negative
>
>  arch/x86/kernel/apic/vector.c |  3 +--
>  kernel/irq/matrix.c           | 11 +++++++++--
>  2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

-- 
Vitaly


      parent reply	other threads:[~2021-03-11 10:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-02-19 11:30 [PATCH RFC 0/2] x86/apic: Avoid cm->allocated going negative in irq_matrix Vitaly Kuznetsov
2021-02-19 11:31 ` [PATCH RFC 1/2] x86/apic: Do not make an exception for PIC_CASCADE_IR when marking legacy irqs " Vitaly Kuznetsov
2021-03-17 20:14   ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-03-17 21:18     ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-03-17 21:40       ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-03-17 22:52         ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-03-18  8:47           ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2021-03-18  8:29     ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2021-03-18 10:10       ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-02-19 11:31 ` [PATCH RFC 2/2] genirq/matrix: WARN_ON_ONCE() when cm->allocated/m->total_allocated go negative Vitaly Kuznetsov
2021-03-17 20:38   ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-03-18  7:58     ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2021-03-18 19:29       ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-03-19  9:59         ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2021-03-11 10:19 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87ft129enb.fsf@vitty.brq.redhat.com \
    --to=vkuznets@redhat.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.