From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6528FC33C9E for ; Tue, 14 Jan 2020 23:06:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3651924670 for ; Tue, 14 Jan 2020 23:06:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728759AbgANXGV (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Jan 2020 18:06:21 -0500 Received: from Galois.linutronix.de ([193.142.43.55]:45372 "EHLO Galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728650AbgANXGU (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Jan 2020 18:06:20 -0500 Received: from p5b06da22.dip0.t-ipconnect.de ([91.6.218.34] helo=nanos.tec.linutronix.de) by Galois.linutronix.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1irVG6-0000Gr-Ci; Wed, 15 Jan 2020 00:06:02 +0100 Received: by nanos.tec.linutronix.de (Postfix, from userid 1000) id D20E7105BC2; Wed, 15 Jan 2020 00:06:01 +0100 (CET) From: Thomas Gleixner To: Christophe Leroy , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Paul Mackerras , Michael Ellerman , arnd@arndb.de, vincenzo.frascino@arm.com, luto@kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 08/12] lib: vdso: allow arches to provide vdso data pointer In-Reply-To: <381e547dbb3c48fd39d6cf208033bba38ad048fb.1578934751.git.christophe.leroy@c-s.fr> References: <381e547dbb3c48fd39d6cf208033bba38ad048fb.1578934751.git.christophe.leroy@c-s.fr> Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2020 00:06:01 +0100 Message-ID: <87ftghbpuu.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Linutronix-Spam-Score: -1.0 X-Linutronix-Spam-Level: - X-Linutronix-Spam-Status: No , -1.0 points, 5.0 required, ALL_TRUSTED=-1,SHORTCIRCUIT=-0.0001 Sender: linux-mips-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-mips@vger.kernel.org Christophe Leroy writes: > > static __maybe_unused int > +#ifdef VDSO_GETS_VD_PTR_FROM_ARCH > +__cvdso_clock_gettime_common(const struct vdso_data *vd, clockid_t clock, > + struct __kernel_timespec *ts) > +{ > +#else > __cvdso_clock_gettime_common(clockid_t clock, struct __kernel_timespec *ts) > { > const struct vdso_data *vd = __arch_get_vdso_data(); > +#endif > u32 msk; If we do that, then there is no point in propagating this to the inner functions. It's perfectly fine to have this distinction at the outermost level. As a related question, I noticed that you keep all that ASM voodoo in the PPC specific code which provides the actual entry points. Is that ASM code really still necessary? All current users of the generic VDSO just do something like: int __vdso_clock_gettime(clockid_t clock, struct __kernel_timespec *ts) { return __cvdso_clock_gettime(clock, ts); } in the architecture code. Is there a reason why this can't work on PPC? Thanks, tglx From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FE20C33C9E for ; Tue, 14 Jan 2020 23:08:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F3E452187F for ; Tue, 14 Jan 2020 23:08:21 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org F3E452187F Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47y5jH2p8NzDqSG for ; Wed, 15 Jan 2020 10:08:19 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=none (no SPF record) smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de (client-ip=2a0a:51c0:0:12e:550::1; helo=galois.linutronix.de; envelope-from=tglx@linutronix.de; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de Received: from Galois.linutronix.de (Galois.linutronix.de [IPv6:2a0a:51c0:0:12e:550::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA256 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47y5fw59B1zDqQQ for ; Wed, 15 Jan 2020 10:06:16 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from p5b06da22.dip0.t-ipconnect.de ([91.6.218.34] helo=nanos.tec.linutronix.de) by Galois.linutronix.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1irVG6-0000Gr-Ci; Wed, 15 Jan 2020 00:06:02 +0100 Received: by nanos.tec.linutronix.de (Postfix, from userid 1000) id D20E7105BC2; Wed, 15 Jan 2020 00:06:01 +0100 (CET) From: Thomas Gleixner To: Christophe Leroy , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Paul Mackerras , Michael Ellerman , arnd@arndb.de, vincenzo.frascino@arm.com, luto@kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 08/12] lib: vdso: allow arches to provide vdso data pointer In-Reply-To: <381e547dbb3c48fd39d6cf208033bba38ad048fb.1578934751.git.christophe.leroy@c-s.fr> References: <381e547dbb3c48fd39d6cf208033bba38ad048fb.1578934751.git.christophe.leroy@c-s.fr> Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2020 00:06:01 +0100 Message-ID: <87ftghbpuu.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Linutronix-Spam-Score: -1.0 X-Linutronix-Spam-Level: - X-Linutronix-Spam-Status: No , -1.0 points, 5.0 required, ALL_TRUSTED=-1, SHORTCIRCUIT=-0.0001 X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: x86@kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" Christophe Leroy writes: > > static __maybe_unused int > +#ifdef VDSO_GETS_VD_PTR_FROM_ARCH > +__cvdso_clock_gettime_common(const struct vdso_data *vd, clockid_t clock, > + struct __kernel_timespec *ts) > +{ > +#else > __cvdso_clock_gettime_common(clockid_t clock, struct __kernel_timespec *ts) > { > const struct vdso_data *vd = __arch_get_vdso_data(); > +#endif > u32 msk; If we do that, then there is no point in propagating this to the inner functions. It's perfectly fine to have this distinction at the outermost level. As a related question, I noticed that you keep all that ASM voodoo in the PPC specific code which provides the actual entry points. Is that ASM code really still necessary? All current users of the generic VDSO just do something like: int __vdso_clock_gettime(clockid_t clock, struct __kernel_timespec *ts) { return __cvdso_clock_gettime(clock, ts); } in the architecture code. Is there a reason why this can't work on PPC? Thanks, tglx From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00FF2C33C9E for ; Tue, 14 Jan 2020 23:06:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C869D24676 for ; Tue, 14 Jan 2020 23:06:24 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="DzySgf+e" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org C869D24676 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Date:References :In-Reply-To:Subject:To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=nl2jmpwPoUzkBWCYivhvePbdf7FPKH59t4JZaoJ5z1g=; b=DzySgf+eOtgfP5 BnT2Tu76cZhDrI1d8sCK/8IebomAz/raLuE2YjSox10kK473WT3w3Bye18jmyT/FsHCOFZ7NonZyl vEzN/HPtR7niHdpJR7PytMOWeVXFd9q21sq5t3bHaIzSM2MTJH/x8bmteuXXZIgXDzrwEpV5E4KNY fxWfY6aVuQQBOPD8hptA9HQINgCsL6+329sxhlzn3fHwZWixOxh0HTs9DGui42fwcb4jM6G7Ivi6f xpWgqFgeOwCAKAvwZakbXwahkBhRlyizKCe2YGz1Ib7WqdgKMhxHII6+q0bnNFRzgjDolV5OEHXqQ kH+/DlDkIJ4eMTWSSrgA==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1irVGP-0001U0-0w; Tue, 14 Jan 2020 23:06:21 +0000 Received: from galois.linutronix.de ([2a0a:51c0:0:12e:550::1]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1irVGI-0001TK-Vy for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 14 Jan 2020 23:06:19 +0000 Received: from p5b06da22.dip0.t-ipconnect.de ([91.6.218.34] helo=nanos.tec.linutronix.de) by Galois.linutronix.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1irVG6-0000Gr-Ci; Wed, 15 Jan 2020 00:06:02 +0100 Received: by nanos.tec.linutronix.de (Postfix, from userid 1000) id D20E7105BC2; Wed, 15 Jan 2020 00:06:01 +0100 (CET) From: Thomas Gleixner To: Christophe Leroy , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Paul Mackerras , Michael Ellerman , arnd@arndb.de, vincenzo.frascino@arm.com, luto@kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 08/12] lib: vdso: allow arches to provide vdso data pointer In-Reply-To: <381e547dbb3c48fd39d6cf208033bba38ad048fb.1578934751.git.christophe.leroy@c-s.fr> References: <381e547dbb3c48fd39d6cf208033bba38ad048fb.1578934751.git.christophe.leroy@c-s.fr> Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2020 00:06:01 +0100 Message-ID: <87ftghbpuu.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Linutronix-Spam-Score: -1.0 X-Linutronix-Spam-Level: - X-Linutronix-Spam-Status: No , -1.0 points, 5.0 required, ALL_TRUSTED=-1, SHORTCIRCUIT=-0.0001 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20200114_150615_170059_D896A97F X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 11.65 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: x86@kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Christophe Leroy writes: > > static __maybe_unused int > +#ifdef VDSO_GETS_VD_PTR_FROM_ARCH > +__cvdso_clock_gettime_common(const struct vdso_data *vd, clockid_t clock, > + struct __kernel_timespec *ts) > +{ > +#else > __cvdso_clock_gettime_common(clockid_t clock, struct __kernel_timespec *ts) > { > const struct vdso_data *vd = __arch_get_vdso_data(); > +#endif > u32 msk; If we do that, then there is no point in propagating this to the inner functions. It's perfectly fine to have this distinction at the outermost level. As a related question, I noticed that you keep all that ASM voodoo in the PPC specific code which provides the actual entry points. Is that ASM code really still necessary? All current users of the generic VDSO just do something like: int __vdso_clock_gettime(clockid_t clock, struct __kernel_timespec *ts) { return __cvdso_clock_gettime(clock, ts); } in the architecture code. Is there a reason why this can't work on PPC? Thanks, tglx _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel