From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB965C43219 for ; Fri, 3 May 2019 12:05:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91D96206C3 for ; Fri, 3 May 2019 12:05:03 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="key not found in DNS" (0-bit key) header.d=codeaurora.org header.i=@codeaurora.org header.b="ByDKfHdY"; dkim=fail reason="key not found in DNS" (0-bit key) header.d=codeaurora.org header.i=@codeaurora.org header.b="KGwY5sQB" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726572AbfECMFC (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 May 2019 08:05:02 -0400 Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org ([198.145.29.96]:53204 "EHLO smtp.codeaurora.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726047AbfECMFC (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 May 2019 08:05:02 -0400 Received: by smtp.codeaurora.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 40E7360DAB; Fri, 3 May 2019 12:05:02 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=codeaurora.org; s=default; t=1556885102; bh=294rR0Akwz5jfvKYEA2j+HnKF5BPrGnec1mvt2REFAo=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=ByDKfHdY38cDirkpnSGDnrg3N8LbojE5sBPG3FM9sjbrOIMp83J2j5OkdeIlIr1ty S7lyo4P0NWhEdAN6tMThx9SnVYD3CZwyEWzGZu8+IY/O02W01pqY4CHJAydaokR7Eq xBLHjALWhdIPqLldyP2P+GB+IthweVmDoIjj2yWw= Received: from potku.adurom.net (88-114-240-156.elisa-laajakaista.fi [88.114.240.156]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: kvalo@smtp.codeaurora.org) by smtp.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1509760A42; Fri, 3 May 2019 12:05:00 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=codeaurora.org; s=default; t=1556885101; bh=294rR0Akwz5jfvKYEA2j+HnKF5BPrGnec1mvt2REFAo=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=KGwY5sQBvK8Tj3yPUJq+vCvRxmltJ0Kan5tVojaXrfW8NorNH/W6DdRrYYjqfU/F1 4wdyR35Jtrm/5/L9DRqPsejrQZk6QUhRGhBhsYMHxlnzpxZ+bcFsGfxiGSOBe9oCP3 RKIv1aZvCzh6OWDnbkBtPYYBo2QUjx5nroc2u1dU= DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 smtp.codeaurora.org 1509760A42 Authentication-Results: pdx-caf-mail.web.codeaurora.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=codeaurora.org Authentication-Results: pdx-caf-mail.web.codeaurora.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=kvalo@codeaurora.org From: Kalle Valo To: Cc: Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] rtw88: minor fixes from suggestions during review References: <1556884415-23474-1-git-send-email-yhchuang@realtek.com> Date: Fri, 03 May 2019 15:04:58 +0300 In-Reply-To: <1556884415-23474-1-git-send-email-yhchuang@realtek.com> (yhchuang@realtek.com's message of "Fri, 3 May 2019 19:53:30 +0800") Message-ID: <87ftpvkal1.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org writes: > From: Yan-Hsuan Chuang > > The series fix some small problems for rtw88, most of the suggestions > are from the review process. > > > v1 -> v2 > > - modify description for LPS, ", turn off" -> ", to turn off" > - drop patch "rtw88: mac: remove dangerous while (1)", > should re-write the power sequence parsing code to make sense of avoiding > infinite loop > - unify Makefile license to Dual GPL/BSD > > > Yan-Hsuan Chuang (5): > rtw88: add license for Makefile > rtw88: pci: use ieee80211_ac_numbers instead of 0-3 > rtw88: pci: check if queue mapping exceeds size of ac_to_hwq > rtw88: fix unassigned rssi_level in rtw_sta_info > rtw88: more descriptions about LPS I was just in the next few minutes about to tag the last -next pull for 5.2. I'll apply patch 1 now so that we have consistent licenses for 5.2 but the rest have to wait for 5.3. -- Kalle Valo