From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37430) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gXgcp-0005Sx-Vy for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 14 Dec 2018 01:07:04 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gXgcm-000298-Ry for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 14 Dec 2018 01:07:03 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:49312) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gXgcm-00028k-LG for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 14 Dec 2018 01:07:00 -0500 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx03.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.13]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DA7BF300207A for ; Fri, 14 Dec 2018 06:06:59 +0000 (UTC) From: Markus Armbruster References: <20181213184340.24037-1-armbru@redhat.com> <20181213184340.24037-28-armbru@redhat.com> <45516d95-2271-5577-8cad-38d66ff2181f@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2018 07:06:56 +0100 In-Reply-To: <45516d95-2271-5577-8cad-38d66ff2181f@redhat.com> (Eric Blake's message of "Thu, 13 Dec 2018 15:52:58 -0600") Message-ID: <87ftv0fxq7.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PULL 27/32] qapi: add #if conditions to generated code members List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Eric Blake Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, =?utf-8?Q?Marc-Andr=C3=A9?= Lureau Eric Blake writes: > On 12/13/18 12:43 PM, Markus Armbruster wrote: >> From: Marc-Andr=C3=A9 Lureau >> >> Wrap generated enum and struct members and their supporting code with >> > > Git ate the line because it started with #. Not sure if you can sneak > in a v2 pull request that puts something sane here... v2 sent, and my .gitconfig now has [commit] cleanup =3D scissors Let's see how I fare with that. Thanks! > >> We do enum and struct in a single patch because union tag enum and the >> associated variants tie them together, and dealing with that to split >> the patch doesn't seem worthwhile. >>