From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (mailfrom) smtp.mailfrom=linux.ibm.com (client-ip=148.163.156.1; helo=mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com; envelope-from=stewart@linux.ibm.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.156.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 42yyZL1n7GzF3PQ for ; Mon, 19 Nov 2018 16:48:58 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098404.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.22/8.16.0.22) with SMTP id wAJ5muhi078849 for ; Mon, 19 Nov 2018 00:48:56 -0500 Received: from e12.ny.us.ibm.com (e12.ny.us.ibm.com [129.33.205.202]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2numr9nj1p-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Mon, 19 Nov 2018 00:48:50 -0500 Received: from localhost by e12.ny.us.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Mon, 19 Nov 2018 05:48:49 -0000 Received: from b01cxnp23034.gho.pok.ibm.com (9.57.198.29) by e12.ny.us.ibm.com (146.89.104.199) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256) Mon, 19 Nov 2018 05:48:45 -0000 Received: from b01ledav001.gho.pok.ibm.com (b01ledav001.gho.pok.ibm.com [9.57.199.106]) by b01cxnp23034.gho.pok.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id wAJ5migI29360270 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Mon, 19 Nov 2018 05:48:44 GMT Received: from b01ledav001.gho.pok.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B7622805C; Mon, 19 Nov 2018 05:48:44 +0000 (GMT) Received: from b01ledav001.gho.pok.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 585792805A; Mon, 19 Nov 2018 05:48:44 +0000 (GMT) Received: from birb.localdomain (unknown [9.185.142.44]) by b01ledav001.gho.pok.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Mon, 19 Nov 2018 05:48:44 +0000 (GMT) Received: by birb.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 063BB4EC69F; Mon, 19 Nov 2018 16:48:43 +1100 (AEDT) From: Stewart Smith To: Sai Dasari , Oskar Senft Cc: OpenBMC Maillist , "bradleyb\@fuzziesquirrel.com" , "gmills\@linux.vnet.ibm.com" Subject: Re: Submit board schematics to OpenBMC docs repo In-Reply-To: <2A161BFC-87CF-4FE9-9DC5-FF1712EE955C@fb.com> References: <2A161BFC-87CF-4FE9-9DC5-FF1712EE955C@fb.com> Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2018 16:48:42 +1100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 18111905-0060-0000-0000-000002D50631 X-IBM-SpamModules-Scores: X-IBM-SpamModules-Versions: BY=3.00010077; HX=3.00000242; KW=3.00000007; PH=3.00000004; SC=3.00000270; SDB=6.01119557; UDB=6.00580869; IPR=6.00899679; MB=3.00024223; MTD=3.00000008; XFM=3.00000015; UTC=2018-11-19 05:48:47 X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 18111905-0061-0000-0000-0000473E2937 Message-Id: <87ftvxpqh1.fsf@linux.vnet.ibm.com> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:, , definitions=2018-11-19_02:, , signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1011 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1810050000 definitions=main-1811190055 X-BeenThere: openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Development list for OpenBMC List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2018 05:48:58 -0000 Sai Dasari writes: > I guess this is a question of # of small repos vs a single large repo wit= h a lot of "stuff" in it. I generally prefer fewer (yet larger) repos vs. t= he overhead of managing multiple small repos. > May be an example would clarify for my suggestion of embedding details wi= th the machine. I was referring to having =E2=80=98witherspooon=E2=80=99 sc= hematics along with the machine layer @ https://github.com/openbmc/openbmc/= tree/master/meta-ibm/meta-witherspoon. This will provide context for how th= is machine witherspoon is designed with all the details.(hypothetical assum= ing witherspoon schematics can be shared in open) Your mail client appears broken and is failing to quote replies correctly. --=20 Stewart Smith OPAL Architect, IBM.