diff for duplicates of <87fu5uc5ug.fsf@xmission.com> diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt index 27acf3d..4a13f85 100644 --- a/a/1.txt +++ b/N1/1.txt @@ -7,10 +7,15 @@ Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> writes: >> am mounting a filesystem. > > The latest version of this patch relies on a builtin IMA policy to set -> a flag. No other changes are required to the IMA policy. This +> a flag. ?No other changes are required to the IMA policy. ?This > builtin policy could be used for environments not willing to accept > the default unverifiable signature risk. I still remain puzzled by this. Why is the default to accept the risk? Eric + +-- +To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-security-module" in +the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org +More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest index a823d4b..b5c0d96 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N1/content_digest @@ -5,18 +5,9 @@ "ref\087tvucifji.fsf@xmission.com\0" "ref\01519135329.3736.88.camel@linux.vnet.ibm.com\0" "From\0ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)\0" - "Subject\0Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] ima: fail signature verification on untrusted filesystems\0" + "Subject\0[PATCH v1 1/2] ima: fail signature verification on untrusted filesystems\0" "Date\0Wed, 21 Feb 2018 16:53:27 -0600\0" - "To\0Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>\0" - "Cc\0James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>" - linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org - linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org - linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org - Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu> - Seth Forshee <seth.forshee@canonical.com> - Dongsu Park <dongsu@kinvolk.io> - Alban Crequy <alban@kinvolk.io> - " Serge E . Hallyn <serge@hallyn.com>\0" + "To\0linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org\0" "\00:1\0" "b\0" "Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> writes:\n" @@ -28,12 +19,17 @@ ">> am mounting a filesystem.\n" ">\n" "> The latest version of this patch relies on a builtin IMA policy to set\n" - "> a flag. No other changes are required to the IMA policy. This\n" + "> a flag. ?No other changes are required to the IMA policy. ?This\n" "> builtin policy could be used for environments not willing to accept\n" "> the default unverifiable signature risk.\n" "\n" "I still remain puzzled by this. Why is the default to accept the risk?\n" "\n" - Eric + "Eric\n" + "\n" + "--\n" + "To unsubscribe from this list: send the line \"unsubscribe linux-security-module\" in\n" + "the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org\n" + More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -8f5c3b3b8e666a7c1fe8899b350d3fefe2486a304319eb41bd82b6261f624769 +d914be86a8393d66ce6bb9f11827f4700317bc3cf746b4fbf1aa3cbc4ea1f708
diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N2/1.txt index 27acf3d..a326e76 100644 --- a/a/1.txt +++ b/N2/1.txt @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> writes: >> am mounting a filesystem. > > The latest version of this patch relies on a builtin IMA policy to set -> a flag. No other changes are required to the IMA policy. This +> a flag. No other changes are required to the IMA policy. This > builtin policy could be used for environments not willing to accept > the default unverifiable signature risk. diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N2/content_digest index a823d4b..0132c1d 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N2/content_digest @@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ ">> am mounting a filesystem.\n" ">\n" "> The latest version of this patch relies on a builtin IMA policy to set\n" - "> a flag. No other changes are required to the IMA policy. This\n" + "> a flag. \302\240No other changes are required to the IMA policy. \302\240This\n" "> builtin policy could be used for environments not willing to accept\n" "> the default unverifiable signature risk.\n" "\n" @@ -36,4 +36,4 @@ "\n" Eric -8f5c3b3b8e666a7c1fe8899b350d3fefe2486a304319eb41bd82b6261f624769 +9f553586e40061c70536e3bd95d65e95ce1197b26e6299d637666d87b8142d95
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.