diff for duplicates of <87fuhpmxto.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt index 1ce9c01..df8f3ee 100644 --- a/a/1.txt +++ b/N1/1.txt @@ -2,14 +2,14 @@ Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org> writes: > On Mon, Apr 03, 2017 at 01:02:28PM +0000, Kalle Valo wrote: >> Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org> writes: ->>=20 +>> >> > Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org> writes: >> > >> >> On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 01:44:20PM +0100, Johan Hovold wrote: >> >>> Make sure to check the number of endpoints to avoid dereferencing a >> >>> NULL-pointer or accessing memory beyond the endpoint array should a >> >>> malicious device lack the expected endpoints. ->> >>>=20 +>> >>> >> >>> Fixes: 36bcce430657 ("ath9k_htc: Handle storage devices") >> >>> Cc: Sujith Manoharan <Sujith.Manoharan@atheros.com> >> >>> Signed-off-by: Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org> @@ -19,19 +19,18 @@ Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org> writes: >> > Yes, I'm just lacking behing: >> > >> > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9620723/ ->>=20 +>> >> Meant "lagging" of course. Mondays.. ->>=20 +>> >> >> As I mentioned earlier, I should have added a >> >> >> >> Cc: stable <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 2.6.39 >> >> ->> >> but left it out as I mistakingly thought the net recommendations to d= -o +>> >> but left it out as I mistakingly thought the net recommendations to do >> >> so applied also to wireless. >> > >> > Ok, I'll add that. ->>=20 +>> >> But is 2.6.39 really correct? Shouldn't it be 2.6.39+ so that it means >> all versions since 2.6.39? > @@ -45,5 +44,5 @@ o Heh, quite confusing :) I added the plus sign already to the patch in my pending branch so unless you object I'll keep it. ---=20 -Kalle Valo= +-- +Kalle Valo diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest index 03406cf..6dad089 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N1/content_digest @@ -20,14 +20,14 @@ "\n" "> On Mon, Apr 03, 2017 at 01:02:28PM +0000, Kalle Valo wrote:\n" ">> Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org> writes:\n" - ">>=20\n" + ">> \n" ">> > Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org> writes:\n" ">> >\n" ">> >> On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 01:44:20PM +0100, Johan Hovold wrote:\n" ">> >>> Make sure to check the number of endpoints to avoid dereferencing a\n" ">> >>> NULL-pointer or accessing memory beyond the endpoint array should a\n" ">> >>> malicious device lack the expected endpoints.\n" - ">> >>>=20\n" + ">> >>> \n" ">> >>> Fixes: 36bcce430657 (\"ath9k_htc: Handle storage devices\")\n" ">> >>> Cc: Sujith Manoharan <Sujith.Manoharan@atheros.com>\n" ">> >>> Signed-off-by: Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>\n" @@ -37,19 +37,18 @@ ">> > Yes, I'm just lacking behing:\n" ">> >\n" ">> > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9620723/\n" - ">>=20\n" + ">> \n" ">> Meant \"lagging\" of course. Mondays..\n" - ">>=20\n" + ">> \n" ">> >> As I mentioned earlier, I should have added a\n" ">> >>\n" ">> >> Cc: stable <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 2.6.39\n" ">> >>\n" - ">> >> but left it out as I mistakingly thought the net recommendations to d=\n" - "o\n" + ">> >> but left it out as I mistakingly thought the net recommendations to do\n" ">> >> so applied also to wireless.\n" ">> >\n" ">> > Ok, I'll add that.\n" - ">>=20\n" + ">> \n" ">> But is 2.6.39 really correct? Shouldn't it be 2.6.39+ so that it means\n" ">> all versions since 2.6.39?\n" ">\n" @@ -63,7 +62,7 @@ "Heh, quite confusing :) I added the plus sign already to the patch in my\n" "pending branch so unless you object I'll keep it.\n" "\n" - "--=20\n" - Kalle Valo= + "-- \n" + Kalle Valo -bc39be5faa5b4d9632dc6ddf3029cf88ceb5dc6841c9fd31fd5df94b0c8222f4 +f4757c64b0dfe6ea9d815bf522379a0d4681f8863dda333e9decc68e360902b3
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.