From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37434) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cYsb9-0000Uq-9q for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 01 Feb 2017 05:57:12 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cYsb6-00013f-8T for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 01 Feb 2017 05:57:11 -0500 Received: from mail-wm0-x234.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c09::234]:37657) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cYsb6-00013Z-0o for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 01 Feb 2017 05:57:08 -0500 Received: by mail-wm0-x234.google.com with SMTP id v77so32291922wmv.0 for ; Wed, 01 Feb 2017 02:57:07 -0800 (PST) References: <20170127103922.19658-1-alex.bennee@linaro.org> <20170127103922.19658-4-alex.bennee@linaro.org> From: Alex =?utf-8?Q?Benn=C3=A9e?= In-reply-to: Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2017 10:57:06 +0000 Message-ID: <87fujy41rx.fsf@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v8 03/25] mttcg: Add missing tb_lock/unlock() in cpu_exec_step() List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Richard Henderson Cc: mttcg@greensocs.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, fred.konrad@greensocs.com, a.rigo@virtualopensystems.com, cota@braap.org, bobby.prani@gmail.com, nikunj@linux.vnet.ibm.com, mark.burton@greensocs.com, pbonzini@redhat.com, jan.kiszka@siemens.com, serge.fdrv@gmail.com, peter.maydell@linaro.org, claudio.fontana@huawei.com, bamvor.zhangjian@linaro.org, Peter Crosthwaite Richard Henderson writes: > On 01/27/2017 02:39 AM, Alex Bennée wrote: >> From: Pranith Kumar >> >> The recent patch enabling lock assertions uncovered the missing lock >> acquisition in cpu_exec_step(). This patch adds them. >> >> CC: Richard Henderson >> CC: Alex Bennée >> Signed-off-by: Pranith Kumar >> --- >> cpu-exec.c | 4 ++++ >> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) > > Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson > > (Didn't I give a r-b for v7 on this?) You did but my tooling dropped the ball recalling this :-/ (I keep tags in an org-mode file which re-writes (foo) to {foo} in the subject which was confusing the script looking for un-applied tags). Anyway done now thanks :-) -- Alex Bennée