From: Nikolaus Rath <Nikolaus@rath.org>
To: Maxim Patlasov <mpatlasov@virtuozzo.com>
Cc: linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com>,
<fuse-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [fuse-devel] fuse: max_background and congestion_threshold settings
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2016 11:19:24 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87fumrmdvn.fsf@thinkpad.rath.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <64a57faa-d3a6-a209-8728-723ed7f37c2f@virtuozzo.com> (Maxim Patlasov's message of "Tue, 15 Nov 2016 09:38:18 -0800")
Hi Maxim,
On Nov 15 2016, Maxim Patlasov <mpatlasov@virtuozzo.com> wrote:
> On 11/15/2016 08:18 AM, Nikolaus Rath wrote:
>> Could someone explain to me the meaning of the max_background and
>> congestion_threshold settings of the fuse module?
>>
>> At first I assumed that max_background specifies the maximum number of
>> pending requests (i.e., requests that have been send to userspace but
>> for which no reply was received yet). But looking at fs/fuse/dev.c, it
>> looks as if not every request is included in this number.
>
> fuse uses max_background for cases where the total number of
> simultaneous requests of given type is not limited by some other
> natural means. AFAIU, these cases are: 1) async processing of direct
> IO; 2) read-ahead. As an example of "natural" limitation: when
> userspace process blocks on a sync direct IO read/write, the number of
> requests fuse consumed is limited by the number of such processes
> (actually their threads). In contrast, if userspace requests 1GB
> direct IO read/write, it would be unreasonable to issue 1GB/128K==8192
> fuse requests simultaneously. That's where max_background steps in.
Ah, that makes sense. Are these two cases meant as examples, or is that
an exhaustive list? Because I would have thought that other cases should
be writing of cached data (when writeback caching is enabled), and
asynchronous I/O from userspace...?
Also, I am not sure what you mean with async processing of direct
I/O. Shouldn't direct I/O always go directly to the file-system? If so,
how can it be processed asynchronously?
Best,
-Nikolaus
--
GPG encrypted emails preferred. Key id: 0xD113FCAC3C4E599F
Fingerprint: ED31 791B 2C5C 1613 AF38 8B8A D113 FCAC 3C4E 599F
»Time flies like an arrow, fruit flies like a Banana.«
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-11-16 19:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-11-15 16:18 fuse: max_background and congestion_threshold settings Nikolaus Rath
2016-11-15 17:38 ` [fuse-devel] " Maxim Patlasov
2016-11-16 19:19 ` Nikolaus Rath [this message]
2016-11-16 19:56 ` Maxim Patlasov
2016-11-16 20:19 ` Nikolaus Rath
2016-11-16 20:41 ` Maxim Patlasov
2016-11-22 22:45 ` Nikolaus Rath
2016-11-22 23:24 ` Maxim Patlasov
2016-11-22 23:43 ` Nikolaus Rath
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87fumrmdvn.fsf@thinkpad.rath.org \
--to=nikolaus@rath.org \
--cc=fuse-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mpatlasov@virtuozzo.com \
--cc=mszeredi@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.