From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Abhishek L Subject: Re: jewel 10.2.4 freeze Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2016 16:46:06 +0200 Message-ID: <87funlerf5.fsf@suse.com> References: <580E1C53.6060503@dachary.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from smtp.nue.novell.com ([195.135.221.5]:42678 "EHLO smtp.nue.novell.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751352AbcJXOqK (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Oct 2016 10:46:10 -0400 In-reply-to: <580E1C53.6060503@dachary.org> Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Loic Dachary Cc: Abhishek L , Ceph Development , Abhishek Varshney Loic Dachary writes: > Hi Abhishek, > > If we were to freeze jewel 10.2.4 today it would have 115 backports[0]. Do you think it we should stop merging new backports and prepare for the release ? If so, I'll ask the lead of each component to make sure nothing is missing from their point of view. Yes, lets start getting the ack from the leads > > You can find the progress of the jewel 10.2.4 release in the ttp://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17487. > > Cheers > > [0] issues backported and merged in jewel 10.2.4 http://tracker.ceph.com/versions/524 > > -- > Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre Best, Abhishek