diff for duplicates of <87funy9obq.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com>

diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt
index 856e645..60bf2a9 100644
--- a/a/1.txt
+++ b/N1/1.txt
@@ -6,23 +6,23 @@ Erik Stromdahl <erik.stromdahl@gmail.com> writes:
 >> WMI" my first thought was that is this actually an ath10k based design?
 >> The product numbers really don't give any indication what driver
 >> supports, the division goes something like this:
->> 
+>>=20
 >> * ath9k: "non-mobile" 11n chips
 >> * ath6k: mobile 11n chips
 >> * ath10k: mobile and "non-mobile" 11ac chips
->> 
+>>=20
 >> For example QCA6174 is an 11ac mobile chip supported by ath10k. ath10k
 >> only supports PCI bus at the moment, but I'm hoping someone would add
 >> USB and SDIO support. Patches are very welcome.
->> 
+>>=20
 >> I'm starting to suspect that QCA6584 is actually based on the same
 >> design as QCA6174. If that's the case when we should also think if
 >> instead we should add SDIO support to ath10k, maybe by taking relevant
 >> parts from ath6kl?
->> 
+>>=20
 >> I'll investigate more what this QCA6584 is, I haven't heard about it
 >> before.
->> 
+>>=20
 >
 > The reason I have patched to ath6kl driver was that it is the
 > only driver with sdio/mbox support.
@@ -62,9 +62,5 @@ also so if there's something which both SDIO and USB need to that would
 need to be easily sharable. Actually after adding SDIO I hope USB would
 be easier to add.
 
--- 
-Kalle Valo
-_______________________________________________
-ath10k mailing list
-ath10k@lists.infradead.org
-http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k
+--=20
+Kalle Valo=
diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest
index 4414578..b11a658 100644
--- a/a/content_digest
+++ b/N1/content_digest
@@ -19,23 +19,23 @@
  ">> WMI\" my first thought was that is this actually an ath10k based design?\n"
  ">> The product numbers really don't give any indication what driver\n"
  ">> supports, the division goes something like this:\n"
- ">> \n"
+ ">>=20\n"
  ">> * ath9k: \"non-mobile\" 11n chips\n"
  ">> * ath6k: mobile 11n chips\n"
  ">> * ath10k: mobile and \"non-mobile\" 11ac chips\n"
- ">> \n"
+ ">>=20\n"
  ">> For example QCA6174 is an 11ac mobile chip supported by ath10k. ath10k\n"
  ">> only supports PCI bus at the moment, but I'm hoping someone would add\n"
  ">> USB and SDIO support. Patches are very welcome.\n"
- ">> \n"
+ ">>=20\n"
  ">> I'm starting to suspect that QCA6584 is actually based on the same\n"
  ">> design as QCA6174. If that's the case when we should also think if\n"
  ">> instead we should add SDIO support to ath10k, maybe by taking relevant\n"
  ">> parts from ath6kl?\n"
- ">> \n"
+ ">>=20\n"
  ">> I'll investigate more what this QCA6584 is, I haven't heard about it\n"
  ">> before.\n"
- ">> \n"
+ ">>=20\n"
  ">\n"
  "> The reason I have patched to ath6kl driver was that it is the\n"
  "> only driver with sdio/mbox support.\n"
@@ -75,11 +75,7 @@
  "need to be easily sharable. Actually after adding SDIO I hope USB would\n"
  "be easier to add.\n"
  "\n"
- "-- \n"
- "Kalle Valo\n"
- "_______________________________________________\n"
- "ath10k mailing list\n"
- "ath10k@lists.infradead.org\n"
- http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k
+ "--=20\n"
+ Kalle Valo=
 
-1367b01c0c64d4dfe4925d6010d2e61e8f631fe309709a163392f0365efb326f
+41834a5e2cd48dcd79a14eac469f915d7cb727ad90a5216d9375d4c65dce05b4
