From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52121) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bAeQz-00060A-Ew for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 08 Jun 2016 10:26:18 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bAeQy-00034K-JJ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 08 Jun 2016 10:26:17 -0400 From: Markus Armbruster References: <1464885987-4039-1-git-send-email-berrange@redhat.com> <20160608115331.GG7760@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2016 16:26:08 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20160608115331.GG7760@redhat.com> (Daniel P. Berrange's message of "Wed, 8 Jun 2016 12:53:31 +0100") Message-ID: <87fusniwov.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 00/11] Provide a QOM-based authorization API List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: "Daniel P. Berrange" Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-block@nongnu.org, Max Reitz , Paolo Bonzini , Andreas =?utf-8?Q?F=C3=A4rber?= "Daniel P. Berrange" writes: > Ping, does anyone have any feedback on these first 3 patches > in particular. If we get agreement on those and get them merged, > then we can feed the rest of this series to the individual > subsystem maintainers that are affected, and also unblock > Max's patch series. I'll try to get to them this week.