From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38673)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <armbru@redhat.com>) id 1apuUU-000833-8I
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 12 Apr 2016 05:20:11 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <armbru@redhat.com>) id 1apuUO-00036p-Gx
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 12 Apr 2016 05:20:10 -0400
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:42838)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <armbru@redhat.com>) id 1apuUO-00036U-CN
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 12 Apr 2016 05:20:04 -0400
From: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
References: <57064764.1010403@telematik-zentrum.de>
	<20160411161432.71dd9b5b@bahia.huguette.org>
	<570BB697.7030701@telematik-zentrum.de>
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2016 11:20:00 +0200
In-Reply-To: <570BB697.7030701@telematik-zentrum.de> (Michael Fritscher's
	message of "Mon, 11 Apr 2016 16:37:11 +0200")
Message-ID: <87fuuri3pb.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Implementing 9p for Windows host
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Michael Fritscher <michael.fritscher@telematik-zentrum.de>
Cc: Greg Kurz <gkurz@linux.vnet.ibm.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org

Michael Fritscher <michael.fritscher@telematik-zentrum.de> writes:

> Hello Greg,
>
> thanks for your answer! Yes, I already jumped in - I was surprised how
> fast it went. I was afraid of much bigger problems ;-) I've a already
> a V2 nearly ready :-) As a teaser: Fixed read/write support and the
> possibility to execute binaries from the mountpoint.
>
> Yes, I decided not to copy the 9p-local.c, because I had to change not
> as many places I thought in the first place.
>
> I'm wondering about the xattr stuff... Perhaps I try to remove the
> <sys/xattr.h> from hw/9pfs/9p-xattr.h and #ifdef the things which are
> broken afterwards. That would have the advantage that I don't have to
> have local function stubs in the 9p-local.c anymore.
>
> To the licence: I asked because I know that other projects have a
> formal process to cope with this - like a written agreement to be
> bound to the license.

We don't do formal CLAs.  Instead, we follow the kernel's lead and
require Signed-off-by.
http://wiki.qemu-project.org/Contribute/SubmitAPatch#Patch_emails_must_include_a_Signed-off-by:_line

Please stick to GPLv2+ for new work, unless you have a really good
reason not to.
http://wiki.qemu-project.org/License