From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42648) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aQXgs-0001kH-AH for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 02 Feb 2016 04:56:07 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aQXgo-0000Jd-9Y for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 02 Feb 2016 04:56:06 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:47145) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aQXgo-0000JY-3v for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 02 Feb 2016 04:56:02 -0500 Received: from int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 980EC70017 for ; Tue, 2 Feb 2016 09:56:01 +0000 (UTC) From: Markus Armbruster References: <1454075341-13658-1-git-send-email-eblake@redhat.com> <87d1sg4l6a.fsf@blackfin.pond.sub.org> Date: Tue, 02 Feb 2016 10:55:59 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87d1sg4l6a.fsf@blackfin.pond.sub.org> (Markus Armbruster's message of "Mon, 01 Feb 2016 14:25:33 +0100") Message-ID: <87fuxbsafk.fsf@blackfin.pond.sub.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v10 00/25] qapi visitor cleanups part 1 (post-introspection cleanups subset E) List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Eric Blake Cc: marcandre.lureau@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Eduardo Habkost Markus Armbruster writes: > Eric Blake writes: > >> Based on qemu.git master. No pending prerequisites >> >> Also available as a tag at this location: >> git fetch git://repo.or.cz/qemu/ericb.git qapi-cleanupv10e >> >> and will soon be part of my branch with the rest of the v5 series, at: >> http://repo.or.cz/qemu/ericb.git/shortlog/refs/heads/qapi >> >> v10 notes: >> This is patches 1-20 of v9; 21-37 of that series will come later, >> but this half was relatively clean and should be ready to merge. >> Plus, this half includes the argument reordering, which touches >> a lot of the tree, so getting it in sooner rather than later will >> minimize rebase churn. A couple patches were split differently >> or retitled. Reviewed-by was kept on patches that didn't change >> in content (even if the content was split across different patch >> boundaries). >> >> Most of the work here was addressing Markus' review comments, >> or rebasing later patches on top of earlier changes. > > I found one harmless rebase mistake, and got a few suggestions on commit > messages, nothing that can't be touched up on commit. > > With the harmless rebase mistake cleaned up, series > Reviewed-by: Markus Armbruster > > [...] Applied to qapi-next with these nits addressed. Marc-Andr=C3=A9, Eric dropped a few of your R-bys. I'll wait a few days in case you'd like to put them back.