From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from wolverine02.qualcomm.com ([199.106.114.251]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1ZkFCz-0007C7-G5 for ath10k@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 08 Oct 2015 17:42:25 +0000 From: Kalle Valo Subject: Re: [PATCH] ath10k: use pre-allocated DMA buffer in Tx References: <1443117270-16790-1-git-send-email-poh@qca.qualcomm.com> <87fv1lvauk.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> <5616A511.5060705@codeaurora.org> Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2015 20:41:48 +0300 In-Reply-To: <5616A511.5060705@codeaurora.org> (Peter Oh's message of "Thu, 8 Oct 2015 10:17:05 -0700") Message-ID: <87fv1ltfz7.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "ath10k" Errors-To: ath10k-bounces+kvalo=adurom.com@lists.infradead.org To: Peter Oh Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, ath10k@lists.infradead.org, Peter Oh Peter Oh writes: > Does it happen after you applied copy engine patchset or even without > the patchset? I saw ath10k_pci_htt_tx_cb in backtrace which is not > merged to master branch yet. If it only happens after the patchset, > I'll apply them and look into it if any possibilities are there. Good point. I thought I was able to reproduce the bug with a clean master branch, but I now checked the logs and all three cases of this warning had ath10k_pci_htt_tx_cb in the stack trace. So I must have accidentally tested with a temporary branch where the pending branch was merged with master branch. -- Kalle Valo _______________________________________________ ath10k mailing list ath10k@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from wolverine02.qualcomm.com ([199.106.114.251]:31243 "EHLO wolverine02.qualcomm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932673AbbJHRmF (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Oct 2015 13:42:05 -0400 From: Kalle Valo To: Peter Oh CC: Peter Oh , , Subject: Re: [PATCH] ath10k: use pre-allocated DMA buffer in Tx References: <1443117270-16790-1-git-send-email-poh@qca.qualcomm.com> <87fv1lvauk.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> <5616A511.5060705@codeaurora.org> Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2015 20:41:48 +0300 In-Reply-To: <5616A511.5060705@codeaurora.org> (Peter Oh's message of "Thu, 8 Oct 2015 10:17:05 -0700") Message-ID: <87fv1ltfz7.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> (sfid-20151008_194210_227802_039696EC) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Peter Oh writes: > Does it happen after you applied copy engine patchset or even without > the patchset? I saw ath10k_pci_htt_tx_cb in backtrace which is not > merged to master branch yet. If it only happens after the patchset, > I'll apply them and look into it if any possibilities are there. Good point. I thought I was able to reproduce the bug with a clean master branch, but I now checked the logs and all three cases of this warning had ath10k_pci_htt_tx_cb in the stack trace. So I must have accidentally tested with a temporary branch where the pending branch was merged with master branch. -- Kalle Valo