From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59947) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YTCTb-0004gY-Kk for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 04 Mar 2015 11:48:52 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YTCTW-0007LI-Df for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 04 Mar 2015 11:48:51 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:56909) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YTCTW-0007L5-5d for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 04 Mar 2015 11:48:46 -0500 From: Markus Armbruster References: <54F45893.5080802@redhat.com> <54F4618D.1050205@redhat.com> <54F5B345.4010706@gmail.com> <54F5BDD5.5070706@redhat.com> <54F5CE1D.7050802@redhat.com> <20150304122659.GA28674@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2015 17:48:37 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20150304122659.GA28674@redhat.com> (Michael S. Tsirkin's message of "Wed, 4 Mar 2015 13:26:59 +0100") Message-ID: <87fv9ku2sa.fsf@blackfin.pond.sub.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Delaying -rc0? List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Cc: Peter Maydell , qemu-devel , Kevin OConnor , Gerd Hoffmann , Marcel Apfelbaum , Paolo Bonzini "Michael S. Tsirkin" writes: > On Wed, Mar 04, 2015 at 12:14:21AM +0900, Peter Maydell wrote: >> On 4 March 2015 at 00:07, Marcel Apfelbaum wrote: >> > In the mean time this series depends on Igor's ACPI dynamic series that took >> > a lot of time to review and even Michael's PULL request with it is not yet >> > in master. >> >> You can view this as an argument against enormous pull requests >> with nearly a hundred patches in them -- they're much more likely >> to hit multiple issues in submission with minor things that need >> fixing, simply because of their size... >> >> thanks >> -- PMM > > Right. There were acpi changes by Igor and PCI changes by Markus, The latter is my "[PATCH 00/10] pci: Partial conversion to realize". Quite a few pending series depend on it. > trying to merge them at once is what created this. > I guess I could instead just do two unrelated pull requests > that can be merged in parallel. Though in Marcel's case, the > problems were all in Igor's patches and these are exactly > the ones Marcel's code depends on. If we can decouple the two, problems with one won't hold up the other anymore. I can do a pull request for just my series, if that helps. But I'm prepared to leave that coveted, glamorous and rewarding job to you ;)