All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@free.fr>
To: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
Cc: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>,
	dmaengine@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dmaengine: virt-dma: fix completion list manipulation
Date: Mon, 02 Mar 2015 23:03:33 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87fv9n12h6.fsf@free.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <54F4D631.6020605@metafoo.de> (Lars-Peter Clausen's message of "Mon, 02 Mar 2015 22:29:21 +0100")

Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de> writes:

> On 03/02/2015 10:19 PM, Robert Jarzmik wrote:
>> diff --git a/drivers/dma/virt-dma.h b/drivers/dma/virt-dma.h
>> index 3772032..2a3da22 100644
>> --- a/drivers/dma/virt-dma.h
>> +++ b/drivers/dma/virt-dma.h
>> @@ -91,7 +91,7 @@ static inline void vchan_cookie_complete(struct virt_dma_desc *vd)
>>   	dma_cookie_complete(&vd->tx);
>>   	dev_vdbg(vc->chan.device->dev, "txd %p[%x]: marked complete\n",
>>   		 vd, cookie);
>> -	list_add_tail(&vd->node, &vc->desc_completed);
>> +	list_move_tail(&vd->node, &vc->desc_completed);
>
> That will break all drivers which handle this currently correctly and remove the
> descriptor from any list before calling vchan_cookie_complete.
Ah, well well I don't agree.

First, let's split the drivers which remove the descriptors and these which
don't :

These which remove the descriptor:
dma-jz4740.c
fsl-edma.c

These which don't remove the descriptor:
amba-pl08x.c
edma.c
img-mdc-dma.c
k3dma.c
moxart-dma.c
omap-dma.c
qcom_bam_dma.c
s3c24xx-dma.c
sa11x0-dma.c
sun6i-dma.c

That settles the correctness I think, the correct behavior is to not remove the
descriptor and let it be done by vchan_cookie_complete().

Now for the remaining 2 drivers, we'll have :
 - list_del(&vd->node) => vd becomes a singleton
 - list_move_tail(&vd->node, &...desc_completed)
   => list_del(&vd->node) : nothing changes, it's a nop
   => list_add_tail(&vd->node, &...desc_completed)

And the behavior remains correct after the patch, only one "list_del()" is done
twice for nothing. Where do you see any breakage ?

Cheers.

-- 
Robert

  reply	other threads:[~2015-03-02 22:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-03-02 21:19 [PATCH] dmaengine: virt-dma: fix completion list manipulation Robert Jarzmik
2015-03-02 21:29 ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2015-03-02 22:03   ` Robert Jarzmik [this message]
2015-03-03  7:23     ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2015-03-03 10:27       ` Robert Jarzmik
2015-03-03 11:21         ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2015-03-03 11:55           ` Robert Jarzmik

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87fv9n12h6.fsf@free.fr \
    --to=robert.jarzmik@free.fr \
    --cc=dmaengine@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lars@metafoo.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=vinod.koul@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.