All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
To: "Benoît Canet" <benoit.canet@irqsave.net>
Cc: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@gmail.com>,
	qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
	Anshul Makkar <anshul.makkar@profitbricks.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] block IO latency tracker without using QMP socket.
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2014 19:14:07 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87fvggsfj4.fsf@blackfin.pond.sub.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140828150044.GE28789@irqsave.net> ("Benoît Canet"'s message of "Thu, 28 Aug 2014 17:00:44 +0200")

Benoît Canet <benoit.canet@irqsave.net> writes:

> The Thursday 28 Aug 2014 à 13:36:35 (+0100), Stefan Hajnoczi wrote :
>> On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 04:58:12PM +0200, Anshul Makkar wrote:
>> > I am writing a block IO latency tracker.
>> > 
>> > As obvious,  I am calculating the latency by tracking the interval between
>> > start of IO and end of IO.
>> > (firing my latency tracker from function BlockDriverAIOCB *raw_aio_submit()
>> > raw-posix.c when job is submitted).
>> > 
>> > The latency data per QEMU process will be written to shared memory and then
>> > another app uses this shared memory to read the data. That's a simple
>> > architecture.
>> > 
>> > Can't use "info blockstats" QMP command as qmp socket is used and blocked
>> > by some other process in our subsystem.
>> > 
>> > Just want a suggestion whether my approach is correct given the constraint
>> > that I can't use qmp socket or if any alternative is possible.
>> 
>> Simplest option: use iostat(1) inside the guest.
>> 
>> Or you can use tracing tools to measure block I/O request latency.
>> 
>> An example from a few years ago:
>> http://www.linux-kvm.org/page/Virtio/Block/Latency
>> 
>> It depends what you are trying to achieve.
>
> Stefan: ProfitBrick is a cloud provider.
>
> This means they could prepare AMI (Virtual machine images) with stuff in it but
> they never would access the shell of a running VM.
>
> What happen in the guest after the AMI instanciation into a running VM is the
> end user business and the cloud provider should not violate the end
> user territory.
>
> I also agree that having QEMU collecting latencies statistics would be
> very useful.

For what it's worth, query-blockstats already reports the sum of certain
latencies.

      reply	other threads:[~2014-08-28 17:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-08-27 14:58 [Qemu-devel] block IO latency tracker without using QMP socket Anshul Makkar
2014-08-27 15:13 ` Benoît Canet
2014-08-28  8:18   ` Markus Armbruster
2014-08-28 12:36 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2014-08-28 15:00   ` Benoît Canet
2014-08-28 17:14     ` Markus Armbruster [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87fvggsfj4.fsf@blackfin.pond.sub.org \
    --to=armbru@redhat.com \
    --cc=anshul.makkar@profitbricks.com \
    --cc=benoit.canet@irqsave.net \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=stefanha@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.