From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] net: Free skbs from irqs when possible. Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2014 10:53:01 -0700 Message-ID: <87fvmf75s2.fsf@xmission.com> References: <20140314.225923.61318448733570839.davem@davemloft.net> <87k3bwqgf7.fsf@xmission.com> <877g7wqg8e.fsf_-_@xmission.com> <20140317.154916.2276987764507311378.davem@davemloft.net> <87iorcgh5d.fsf_-_@xmission.com> <87fvmgf2c7.fsf_-_@xmission.com> <1395149407.22343.8.camel@deadeye.wl.decadent.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: David Miller , stephen@networkplumber.org, eric.dumazet@gmail.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com, mpm@selenic.com, satyam.sharma@gmail.com To: Ben Hutchings Return-path: Received: from out01.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.13.231]:53213 "EHLO out01.mta.xmission.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757289AbaCRRxI (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Mar 2014 13:53:08 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1395149407.22343.8.camel@deadeye.wl.decadent.org.uk> (Ben Hutchings's message of "Tue, 18 Mar 2014 13:30:07 +0000") Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Ben Hutchings writes: > On Mon, 2014-03-17 at 23:27 -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > [...] >> --- a/net/core/skbuff.c >> +++ b/net/core/skbuff.c >> @@ -554,14 +554,21 @@ static void kfree_skbmem(struct sk_buff *skb) >> >> static void skb_release_head_state(struct sk_buff *skb) >> { >> + WARN_ONCE(in_irq() && !skb_irq_freeable(skb), >> + "%s called from irq! sp %d nfct %d frag_list %d %pF dst %lx", >> + __func__, >> + IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_XFRM) ? !!skb->sp : 0, >> + IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK) ? !!skb->nfct : 0, > [...] > > This is a syntax error if CONFIG_XFRM or CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK is > disabled; you have to use #ifdef's. Doh! That if nothing else definitely calls for a respin of this patch. Eric