From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from wolverine02.qualcomm.com ([199.106.114.251]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1WOPSb-0007RM-VW for ath10k@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 14 Mar 2014 10:35:31 +0000 From: Kalle Valo Subject: Re: Performance of ath10k References: <005b01cf3f6b$6c6c4840$4544d8c0$@innovelec.co.uk> Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2014 12:34:56 +0200 In-Reply-To: <005b01cf3f6b$6c6c4840$4544d8c0$@innovelec.co.uk> (Trevor Cullen's message of "Fri, 14 Mar 2014 09:54:41 +0000") Message-ID: <87fvml83vz.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "ath10k" Errors-To: ath10k-bounces+kvalo=adurom.com@lists.infradead.org To: Trevor Cullen Cc: 'Vu Hai NGUYEN' , ath10k@lists.infradead.org Trevor Cullen writes: > There's much debate going on in my circles about this card. It's based on > the QCA XB140 reference design which supposedly supports 11a,b,g,n, ac at > 2.4G or 5G (not concurrent). > > So does ath10k support this card fully? Fully? You do understand that there are a LOT of features in 802.11 :) Few things which come to my mind: * XB140 needs 10.1.467.2-1 firmware and Ad-Hoc is not supported in that firmware * DFS works only on ETSI region * mac80211 doesn't support VHT on 2.4 G -- Kalle Valo _______________________________________________ ath10k mailing list ath10k@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k