From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ebiederm-aS9lmoZGLiVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org (Eric W. Biederman) Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND] userns: enable tmpfs support for user namespace Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2013 02:15:22 -0800 Message-ID: <87fw20f745.fsf@xmission.com> References: <1358331945-4106-1-git-send-email-gaofeng@cn.fujitsu.com> <20130116143532.GA4035@sergelap> <50F74EC6.60004@cn.fujitsu.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <50F74EC6.60004-BthXqXjhjHXQFUHtdCDX3A@public.gmane.org> (Gao feng's message of "Thu, 17 Jan 2013 09:07:18 +0800") List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: containers-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org Errors-To: containers-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org To: Gao feng Cc: containers-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org List-Id: containers.vger.kernel.org Gao feng writes: > On 2013/01/16 22:35, Serge Hallyn wrote: >> Quoting Gao feng (gaofeng-BthXqXjhjHXQFUHtdCDX3A@public.gmane.org): >>> From: gaofeng >>> >>> Since the memory used by tmpfs is under control of >>> memory cgroup. and the files under the tmpfs will not >>> be leak to other tmpfs. >>> >>> So mounting tmpfs in user namespace does no harm to the >>> host,we can allow tmpfs to be mounted in user namespace. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: gaofeng >> >> I've got the same patch in my kernel at >> http://kernel.ubuntu.com/git?p=serge/quantal-userns.git;a=summary >> >> except note that there are two definitions of shmem_fs_type. >> > > Yes, I miss the other one,Do you have plan to push this patch > into linus's linux-2.6 or eric's userns tree? Linus's linux-2.6.git is a symlink to Linus's linux.git Talking about 2.6 in this day and age is a bit confusing. > I'm trying to add userns support for libvirt,so I need tmpfs to > be allowed to mount in userns. At a practical level I am happy to apply a complete patch in my tree once if it gets posted to fs-devel and probably lkml for review, and I have had a chance to read the memory control group and verify with my own little eyes that the memory control group can in fact limit tmpfs. Eric