From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jani Nikula Subject: Re: -next: no resume from suspend Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2013 11:20:43 +0200 Message-ID: <87fw21wkk4.fsf@intel.com> References: <50F3D9E8.6040802@suse.cz> <16191961.j5ydKsJ3d3@vostro.rjw.lan> <50F3FFE6.4090108@suse.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mga03.intel.com ([143.182.124.21]:25317 "EHLO mga03.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754226Ab3APJTr (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Jan 2013 04:19:47 -0500 In-Reply-To: <50F3FFE6.4090108@suse.cz> Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org To: Jiri Slaby , "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch, LKML , dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, Linux PM mailing list On Mon, 14 Jan 2013, Jiri Slaby wrote: > On 01/14/2013 01:56 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >> On Monday, January 14, 2013 11:11:52 AM Jiri Slaby wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> since friday's -next (the last known to be working is the last monday's) >>> I cannot resume from suspend. The last thing I see with >>> no_console_suspend is: >>> i915: No ACPI video bus found >>> >>> But I used to see the message always, so this is no difference. Any idea >>> before I start bisecting? >> >> Well, what's the next message you normally see with no_console_suspend? > > [drm] Initialized i915 1.6.0 20080730 for 0000:00:02.0 on minor 0 > > Adding DRM and intel guys. Hi Jiri, the dmesgs for both cases with drm.debug=0xe module param might give us some clues. Does it work without no_console_suspend? BR, Jani.