From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: OGAWA Hirofumi Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] fat: fix time updates for create and delete Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2012 18:22:11 +0900 Message-ID: <87fw4f5g70.fsf@devron.myhome.or.jp> References: <1352642278-2730-1-git-send-email-linkinjeon@gmail.com> <874nkw86jz.fsf@devron.myhome.or.jp> <87sj8f5k4m.fsf@devron.myhome.or.jp> <87obj35k3a.fsf@devron.myhome.or.jp> <87k3tr5g8v.fsf@devron.myhome.or.jp> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Amit Sahrawat To: Namjae Jeon Return-path: In-Reply-To: <87k3tr5g8v.fsf@devron.myhome.or.jp> (OGAWA Hirofumi's message of "Mon, 12 Nov 2012 18:21:04 +0900") Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org OGAWA Hirofumi writes: > Namjae Jeon writes: > >>>> What was difference with XFS, FAT, and MSDOS? >> Okay, the description of patch was lacked, So I will resend patch with >> specifical test reseult with other filesystem. >>> >>> BTW, I recall I checked this, and yes, it is strange. But it is historical. >> "historical" means It is difficult to change ? > > The timestamp handling was not same with unix fs from initial, and FAT > doesn't have inode change timestamp. This historical reason it is not > better to change to same with unix fs, and never be possible to support > inode change timestamp cleanly. I.e. the user visible change without strong reason is the wrong. -- OGAWA Hirofumi