All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: arnaud.patard@rtp-net.org (Arnaud Patard (Rtp))
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCHv2 1/2] ARM: mx51: Implement code to allow mx51 to enter WFI
Date: Mon, 07 Mar 2011 17:02:28 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87fwqyvrzf.fsf@lebrac.rtp-net.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56132A77AB93C141BF06E6B96CA6CFEA193F14@039-SN1MPN1-004.039d.mgd.msft.net> (Nguyen Dinh-R's message of "Mon, 7 Mar 2011 15:37:38 +0000")

Nguyen Dinh-R00091 <R00091@freescale.com> writes:

> Hi Arnaud,

Hi,
>
> Just to verify that you are testing on an MX51-Babbage board? Here's my log:

I never said I was testing on babbage. The reason is because I'm using a
efika smartbook and not a babbage.

>
> root at freescale ~$ uname -a
> Linux freescale 2.6.38-rc1+ #93 Fri Mar 4 17:18:15 CST 2011 armv7l GNU/Linux

2.6.38-rc1+ ? which tree are you using ? The for-next branch of Sascha
Hauer's tree is at least 2.6.38-rc5 so you're trying to merge something
without even testing it on the current tree. Can you please test suspend
with current imx for-next tree (with no other patches than theses 2
patches if possible), in order to make sure that it's still working with it ?

Thanks,
Arnaud

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Arnaud Patard (Rtp) <arnaud.patard@rtp-net.org>
To: Nguyen Dinh-R00091 <R00091@freescale.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel\@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel\@lists.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	"linux\@arm.linux.org.uk" <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
	"s.hauer\@pengutronix.de" <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>,
	"u.kleine-koenig\@pengutronix.de"
	<u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>,
	Zhang Lily-R58066 <R58066@freescale.com>,
	Vaidyanathan Ranjani-RA5478 <RA5478@freescale.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 1/2] ARM: mx51: Implement code to allow mx51 to enter WFI
Date: Mon, 07 Mar 2011 17:02:28 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87fwqyvrzf.fsf@lebrac.rtp-net.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56132A77AB93C141BF06E6B96CA6CFEA193F14@039-SN1MPN1-004.039d.mgd.msft.net> (Nguyen Dinh-R's message of "Mon, 7 Mar 2011 15:37:38 +0000")

Nguyen Dinh-R00091 <R00091@freescale.com> writes:

> Hi Arnaud,

Hi,
>
> Just to verify that you are testing on an MX51-Babbage board? Here's my log:

I never said I was testing on babbage. The reason is because I'm using a
efika smartbook and not a babbage.

>
> root@freescale ~$ uname -a
> Linux freescale 2.6.38-rc1+ #93 Fri Mar 4 17:18:15 CST 2011 armv7l GNU/Linux

2.6.38-rc1+ ? which tree are you using ? The for-next branch of Sascha
Hauer's tree is at least 2.6.38-rc5 so you're trying to merge something
without even testing it on the current tree. Can you please test suspend
with current imx for-next tree (with no other patches than theses 2
patches if possible), in order to make sure that it's still working with it ?

Thanks,
Arnaud

  reply	other threads:[~2011-03-07 16:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-03-04 23:29 [PATCHv2 1/2] ARM: mx51: Implement code to allow mx51 to enter WFI Dinh.Nguyen at freescale.com
2011-03-04 23:29 ` Dinh.Nguyen
2011-03-04 23:29 ` [PATCHv2 2/2] ARM: mx51: Add support for low power suspend on MX51 Dinh.Nguyen at freescale.com
2011-03-04 23:29   ` Dinh.Nguyen
2011-03-11  9:16   ` Arnaud Patard (Rtp)
2011-03-11  9:16     ` Arnaud Patard
2011-03-04 23:33 ` [PATCHv2 1/2] ARM: mx51: Implement code to allow mx51 to enter WFI Nguyen Dinh-R00091
2011-03-04 23:33   ` Nguyen Dinh-R00091
2011-03-05 20:46   ` Arnaud Patard (Rtp)
2011-03-05 20:46     ` Arnaud Patard
2011-03-07 15:37     ` Nguyen Dinh-R00091
2011-03-07 15:37       ` Nguyen Dinh-R00091
2011-03-07 16:02       ` Arnaud Patard (Rtp) [this message]
2011-03-07 16:02         ` Arnaud Patard
2011-03-07 16:35         ` Nguyen Dinh-R00091
2011-03-07 16:35           ` Nguyen Dinh-R00091
2011-03-07 18:07           ` s.hauer at pengutronix.de
2011-03-07 18:07             ` s.hauer
2011-03-07 20:01             ` Nguyen Dinh-R00091
2011-03-07 20:01               ` Nguyen Dinh-R00091
2011-03-08 11:40             ` David Jander
2011-03-08 11:40               ` David Jander
2011-03-10 13:37               ` s.hauer at pengutronix.de
2011-03-10 13:37                 ` s.hauer
2011-03-10 16:06                 ` David Jander
2011-03-10 16:06                   ` David Jander
2011-03-07 20:29         ` Nguyen Dinh-R00091
2011-03-07 20:29           ` Nguyen Dinh-R00091
2011-03-10 15:12 ` Nguyen Dinh-R00091
2011-03-10 15:12   ` Nguyen Dinh-R00091

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87fwqyvrzf.fsf@lebrac.rtp-net.org \
    --to=arnaud.patard@rtp-net.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.