From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from galois.linutronix.de (Galois.linutronix.de [193.142.43.55]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BC8472ED17A; Thu, 18 Sep 2025 08:31:09 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1758184271; cv=none; b=CFzsejgdr+7BphX3T54KfWb35rVpND/rTaTpp9IwylyRSXaOgXfO6nOvn8PNioRYKGaayZbPsK4a+n84xeuYLDQnwXTWvdVKgo7afK7xZJUXzALGX5PTtfoK8os62Vp38wiuG3VjcN49/A2sb+9OR94CmeS5LroGIn/6PBnD3Bw= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1758184271; c=relaxed/simple; bh=G4M2r631pn7Zt96E0MYNERhodv6pTD5S3MULZ7MUpBQ=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=e8R8FzH0Kz/4orFqGwBGTI477KICTx+aJdT8PXYmBZpJnIlYpcZDj4SsVxUZ/H7FbLrx3dvO8TvAKA6DOi5/xwjoCFGPBLOgZfm5Fb6KZxRtmiLCD9Kbm3JLjOVc5wM9etpMtWXgS2BnERUTdyWeQfhWaOI8BTjldKgqD5dafts= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=lu4vPTDS; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=frcmEIKN; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="lu4vPTDS"; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="frcmEIKN" From: Thomas Gleixner DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1758184267; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=G4M2r631pn7Zt96E0MYNERhodv6pTD5S3MULZ7MUpBQ=; b=lu4vPTDSDrmy1XdWHB/sLy0SqaZOEv6ADAZtGJcbBWuiqi3NXackrLMUa4tY70nStxmHQA f8GocqMXu9uQQHpWm8RQ1MnUjy/yB223tXLGwSPWpLvbe+bG77ut89Sa2dbqm0Dj7zPl5/ KjSY9Fztu2dN7qEPPiKmjZy3/KrXHpbUyd3eyNcVyw9wRuHqEU4HlAPWLzlLeex2tPABhn /F/KzbMjHWTYSpb+FXU43HSdfmRwjlFJyi0g4EOQ424a8idA/64/at4BA99lxMRWdQ50hM 8h3x/NRaUtu5mekRqCYs/6m7W1bp7plPQv5hefziiscO21wnV9LRIbeKIZeXYg== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1758184267; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=G4M2r631pn7Zt96E0MYNERhodv6pTD5S3MULZ7MUpBQ=; b=frcmEIKN8MoYfH2Xt5r/GzN/HG2lhTn34uPmygvDmSBBiNytSkGd5EZuf12+Z2VFeRcl2h Nbh+prw79Xw3v1AQ== To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , LKML Cc: Randy Dunlap , Linux PM , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Peter Zijlstra Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] smp: Fix up and expand the smp_call_function_many() kerneldoc In-Reply-To: References: <6191405.lOV4Wx5bFT@rafael.j.wysocki> Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2025 10:31:06 +0200 Message-ID: <87h5x088mt.ffs@tglx> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Sep 16 2025 at 16:13, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Tue, Sep 9, 2025 at 1:44=E2=80=AFPM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >> >> From: Rafael J. Wysocki >> >> The smp_call_function_many() kerneldoc comment got out of sync with the >> function definition (bool parameter "wait" is incorrectly described as a >> bitmask in it), so fix it up by copying the "wait" description from the >> smp_call_function() kerneldoc and add information regarding the handling >> of the local CPU to it. >> >> Fixes: 49b3bd213a9f ("smp: Fix all kernel-doc warnings") >> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki > > It's been a week and no feedback. > > Well, in the further absence of any, I'll assume no concerns and just > queue this up. Sorry, was distracted. No objections from my side. Did you queue it already?