From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>, peterz@infradead.org, x86@kernel.org
Cc: rafael@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH backport to 6.10] x86/cpu: Add INTEL_FAM6_LUNARLAKE_M to X86_BUG_MONITOR
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2024 02:07:27 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87h68dnttc.ffs@tglx> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241108135206.435793-2-lenb@kernel.org>
On Fri, Nov 08 2024 at 08:49, Len Brown wrote:
> From: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
>
> Under some conditions, MONITOR wakeups on Lunar Lake processors
> can be lost, resulting in significant user-visible delays.
>
> Add LunarLake to X86_BUG_MONITOR so that wake_up_idle_cpu()
> always sends an IPI, avoiding this potential delay.
> Update the X86_BUG_MONITOR workaround to handle
> the new smp_kick_mwait_play_dead() path.
>
> Closes: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=219364
>
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.10
> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
> ---
> This is a backport of the upstream patch to Linux-6.10 and earlier
You either fail to understand or intentionally ignore the process for
stable backports, which is in place since more than a decade.
Documentation/process/* has plenty of information how that works and
you're around long enough to know that already.
I don't care about you wasting your time, but I very much care about you
wasting my time to deal with pointless emails. I get plenty enough of
them every day.
Thanks,
tglx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-11-12 1:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-11-08 13:49 [PATCh 0/2] Add Intel Lunarlake to X86_BUG_MONITOR Len Brown
2024-11-08 13:49 ` [PATCH backport to 6.10] x86/cpu: Add INTEL_FAM6_LUNARLAKE_M " Len Brown
2024-11-08 13:53 ` kernel test robot
2024-11-12 1:07 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2024-11-08 13:49 ` [PATCH] x86/cpu: Add INTEL_LUNARLAKE_M " Len Brown
2024-11-08 14:34 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-11-11 16:23 ` Peter Zijlstra
2024-11-12 0:27 ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-11-12 5:28 ` [PATCH 0/1 v2] " Len Brown
2024-11-12 5:28 ` [PATCH 1/1] " Len Brown
2024-11-12 11:44 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
[not found] ` <CAJvTdKnRpDQKUVNJ4Gp7r+WaHo0y-Wume3ay7toHU+Xz0gv2Zw@mail.gmail.com>
2024-11-12 13:14 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
[not found] ` <CAJvTdK=SnRqwjR5fUatP0CzaXD_CpZ-1cc+2yX0D8_XM_3oJUw@mail.gmail.com>
2024-11-12 15:02 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-11-11 20:20 ` [PATCH] " Thomas Gleixner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87h68dnttc.ffs@tglx \
--to=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.