From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7A6B7CE8351 for ; Mon, 30 Sep 2024 14:47:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1svHgK-0003zo-30; Mon, 30 Sep 2024 10:47:26 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1svHfz-0003mN-Vw for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 30 Sep 2024 10:47:05 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([170.10.129.124]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1svHfw-0001Zy-U6 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 30 Sep 2024 10:47:02 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1727707618; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding:resent-to: resent-from:resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references; bh=gYx1twiezc7BfiTK/utNYV0es8LDOUkB138p1q1rShw=; b=YedTixJ/MJwl6lRMZVMYnWnzg4LhJoCfqORJWYy0kyBSzc7aVfBJ5Y4bjsivgu8ACoPEmT 8PacU1vcxui0N2dVzzyGs8fGlWQ72wZQG1TtT5VJYYYJi9OtNuAkqIB0Mt3RYCt/QJ4MN6 oP0J2u4tgoTi/eU6hai3v08x0+MuOHU= Received: from mx-prod-mc-05.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (ec2-54-186-198-63.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com [54.186.198.63]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-295-7O0trldlNAWVdO8pVP5mTw-1; Mon, 30 Sep 2024 10:46:57 -0400 X-MC-Unique: 7O0trldlNAWVdO8pVP5mTw-1 Received: from mx-prod-int-05.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (unknown [10.30.177.17]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mx-prod-mc-05.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9CDE7193C538; Mon, 30 Sep 2024 14:46:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from blackfin.pond.sub.org (unknown [10.39.192.47]) by mx-prod-int-05.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 617441955DC7; Mon, 30 Sep 2024 14:46:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: by blackfin.pond.sub.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 8508F21E6A28; Mon, 30 Sep 2024 16:46:49 +0200 (CEST) Resent-To: integration@gluster.org, devel@lists.libvirt.org, qemu-block@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org Resent-From: Markus Armbruster Resent-Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2024 16:46:49 +0200 Resent-Message-ID: <875xqdgpwm.fsf@pond.sub.org> From: Markus Armbruster To: Daniel P. =?utf-8?Q?Berrang=C3=A9?= Cc: Thomas Huth , qemu-block@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Eric Blake , devel@lists.libvirt.org, integration@gluster.org, Kevin Wolf , Hanna Reitz Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] docs: Mark "gluster" support in QEMU as deprecated In-Reply-To: ("Daniel P. =?utf-8?Q?Berrang?= =?utf-8?Q?=C3=A9=22's?= message of "Mon, 30 Sep 2024 13:52:08 +0100") References: <20240925071514.13728-1-thuth@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2024 16:08:19 +0200 Message-ID: <87h69xi698.fsf@pond.sub.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.0 on 10.30.177.17 Received-SPF: pass client-ip=170.10.129.124; envelope-from=armbru@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com X-Spam_score_int: -21 X-Spam_score: -2.2 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.2 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.144, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Daniel P. Berrang=C3=A9 writes: > On Wed, Sep 25, 2024 at 09:15:14AM +0200, Thomas Huth wrote: >> According to https://marc.info/?l=3Dfedora-devel-list&m=3D171934833215726 >> the GlusterFS development effectively ended. Thus mark it as deprecated >> in QEMU, so we can remove it in a future release if the project does >> not gain momentum again. >>=20 >> Acked-by: Niels de Vos >> Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth >> --- >> v2: Mark it as deprecated in the QAPI and print a warning once, too >>=20 >> docs/about/deprecated.rst | 9 +++++++++ >> qapi/block-core.json | 7 ++++++- >> block/gluster.c | 2 ++ >> 3 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >>=20 >> diff --git a/docs/about/deprecated.rst b/docs/about/deprecated.rst >> index ed31d4b0b2..b231aa3948 100644 >> --- a/docs/about/deprecated.rst >> +++ b/docs/about/deprecated.rst >> @@ -395,6 +395,15 @@ Specifying the iSCSI password in plain text on the = command line using the >> used instead, to refer to a ``--object secret...`` instance that provid= es >> a password via a file, or encrypted. >>=20=20 >> +``gluster`` backend (since 9.2) >> +^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ >> + >> +According to https://marc.info/?l=3Dfedora-devel-list&m=3D1719348332157= 26 >> +the GlusterFS development effectively ended. Unless the development >> +gains momentum again, the QEMU project might remove the gluster backend >> +in a future release. > > I'd suggest the second half of the sentance can be simplified: > > ", the QEMU project will remove the gluster backend/" > > since marking something as deprecated is a stronger than "might". > We /will/ remove it, unless new informaton comes to light that > makes us re-evaluate the plans. Good point.