From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
To: cuigaosheng <cuigaosheng1@huawei.com>,
LEROY Christophe <christophe.leroy2@cs-soprasteria.com>,
"npiggin@gmail.com" <npiggin@gmail.com>,
"naveen@kernel.org" <naveen@kernel.org>,
"akpm@linux-foundation.org" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"david@redhat.com" <david@redhat.com>,
"Liam.Howlett@oracle.com" <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com>,
"tglx@linutronix.de" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"bgray@linux.ibm.com" <bgray@linux.ibm.com>,
"joel@jms.id.au" <joel@jms.id.au>,
"bhelgaas@google.com" <bhelgaas@google.com>
Cc: "linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next 1/4] powerpc: Remove obsoleted declaration for _get_SP
Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2024 20:41:13 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87h6b2e1iu.fsf@mail.lhotse> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <48668764-8a8f-98f8-909a-8406207499d7@huawei.com>
cuigaosheng <cuigaosheng1@huawei.com> writes:
> On 2024/8/22 22:16, LEROY Christophe wrote:
>>
>> Le 22/08/2024 à 15:06, Gaosheng Cui a écrit :
>>> [Vous ne recevez pas souvent de courriers de cuigaosheng1@huawei.com. Découvrez pourquoi ceci est important à https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ]
>>>
>>> The _get_SP() have been removed since
>>> commit 917f0af9e5a9 ("powerpc: Remove arch/ppc and include/asm-ppc"),
>>> and now it is useless, so remove it.
>> Not sure that commit is relevant since it relates to arch/ppc/ not
>> arch/powerpc/
>>
>> For arch/powerpc/ I think it is commit f4db196717c6 ("[POWERPC] Remove
>> _get_SP")
>
> In commit 1da177e4c3f4, linux implemented the _get_SP function in misc.S
> and declared and use it in arch/ppc/kernel/process.c, the declaration
> of _get_SP in arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c was introduced in commit
> 14cf11af6cf608, but at this time arch/powerpc/kernel/misc_32.S has not
> been introduced yet,so I think the declaration belongs to _get_SP in the
> misc.S,it have been removed since commit 917f0af9e5a9.
It's true that in
14cf11af6cf6 ("powerpc: Merge enough to start building in arch/powerpc.")
there was no _get_SP() in arch/powerpc, and the build used the one in
arch/ppc, and so at that point the prototype in
arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c was for the implementation in arch/ppc.
But in commit
e7e2d2da2638 ("powerpc: Don't compile in arch/ppc/kernel for 32-bit ARCH=powerpc")
we stopped building arch/ppc/kernel as part of the powerpc build.
So from then on the prototype was for the implementation in
arch/powerpc. If we check out e7e2d2da2638 and grep in arch/powerpc for _get_SP:
$ git grep -w _get_SP arch/powerpc/ include/asm-powerpc/
arch/powerpc/kernel/misc_32.S:_GLOBAL(_get_SP)
arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c:extern unsigned long _get_SP(void);
So it was indeed f4db196717c6 ("[POWERPC] Remove _get_SP") that removed
the implementation this prototype was referring to.
I'll update the change log, no need to send a v2.
cheers
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-08-30 10:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-08-22 13:06 [PATCH -next 0/4] Remove obsoleted declaration for powerpc Gaosheng Cui
2024-08-22 13:06 ` [PATCH -next 1/4] powerpc: Remove obsoleted declaration for _get_SP Gaosheng Cui
2024-08-22 14:16 ` LEROY Christophe
2024-08-22 15:25 ` cuigaosheng
2024-08-23 16:40 ` Christophe Leroy
2024-08-30 10:41 ` Michael Ellerman [this message]
2024-08-22 13:06 ` [PATCH -next 2/4] powerpc: Remove obsoleted declaration for maple_calibrate_decr Gaosheng Cui
2024-08-22 13:06 ` [PATCH -next 3/4] powerpc: Remove obsoleted declaration for pas_pci_irq_fixup Gaosheng Cui
2024-08-22 13:06 ` [PATCH -next 4/4] powerpc: Remove obsoleted declarations for use_cop and drop_cop Gaosheng Cui
2024-09-06 11:52 ` [PATCH -next 0/4] Remove obsoleted declaration for powerpc Michael Ellerman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87h6b2e1iu.fsf@mail.lhotse \
--to=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bgray@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=christophe.leroy2@cs-soprasteria.com \
--cc=cuigaosheng1@huawei.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=joel@jms.id.au \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=naveen@kernel.org \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.