From: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
To: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com>,
tytso@mit.edu, adilger.kernel@dilger.ca,
linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 00/11] cleanups and unit test for mballoc
Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2023 20:05:35 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87h6of8eko.fsf@doe.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c92574b5-1441-645c-4824-723545e45845@huaweicloud.com>
Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com> writes:
> on 8/30/2023 3:02 AM, Ritesh Harjani wrote:
>> Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com> writes:
>>
>>> v5-v6:
>>>
>>
>> Hi Kemeng,
>>
>> Sorry for the delay in getting started on this. I am going through the
>> series now.
>>
>>> 1. Separate block bitmap and buddy bitmap freeing in individual patch
>>> and rewrite the descriptions.
>>> 2. Remove #ifdef around KUNIT_STATIC_STUB_REDIRECT which should be
>>> only defined when CONFIG_KUNIT is enabled after fix [7] which was merged
>>> into kunit-next/kunit
> Hi ritesh, thanks for feedback. I think the compilation problem below is
> relevant to this change which relie on fix [7]. I'm not sure if I need to
> include fix [7] in this set to fix the compilation error. Would like to
> hear any advise!
>
No, we need not include [7] in this series. I should have noticed that
in your above updates. I generally also provide a separate note or at
the top section about which branch and/or changes are requried for
testing the patch series, hence I overlooked it.
Thanks for pointing out.
-ritesh
prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-08-31 14:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-08-26 15:50 [PATCH v6 00/11] cleanups and unit test for mballoc Kemeng Shi
2023-08-26 15:50 ` [PATCH v6 01/11] ext4: factor out codes to update block bitmap and group descriptor on disk from ext4_mb_mark_bb Kemeng Shi
2023-08-31 12:33 ` Ritesh Harjani
2023-08-31 13:42 ` Kemeng Shi
2023-08-31 14:07 ` Ritesh Harjani
2023-09-04 2:50 ` Kemeng Shi
2023-09-04 8:30 ` Ritesh Harjani
2023-08-26 15:50 ` [PATCH v6 02/11] ext4: call ext4_mb_mark_context in ext4_free_blocks_simple Kemeng Shi
2023-08-31 14:25 ` Ritesh Harjani
2023-09-04 2:51 ` Kemeng Shi
2023-08-26 15:50 ` [PATCH v6 03/11] ext4: extent ext4_mb_mark_context to support allocation under journal Kemeng Shi
2023-08-31 15:51 ` Ritesh Harjani
2023-08-26 15:50 ` [PATCH v6 04/11] ext4: call ext4_mb_mark_context in ext4_mb_mark_diskspace_used Kemeng Shi
2023-09-01 3:51 ` Ritesh Harjani
2023-09-04 2:54 ` Kemeng Shi
2023-08-26 15:50 ` [PATCH v6 05/11] ext4: Separate block bitmap and buddy bitmap freeing in ext4_mb_clear_bb() Kemeng Shi
2023-09-01 9:34 ` Ritesh Harjani
2023-09-04 3:00 ` Kemeng Shi
2023-09-12 7:02 ` Kemeng Shi
2023-09-12 10:13 ` Ritesh Harjani
2023-09-12 11:32 ` Kemeng Shi
2023-08-26 15:50 ` [PATCH v6 06/11] ext4: call ext4_mb_mark_context in ext4_mb_clear_bb Kemeng Shi
2023-09-01 9:38 ` Ritesh Harjani
2023-08-26 15:50 ` [PATCH v6 07/11] ext4: Separate block bitmap and buddy bitmap freeing in ext4_group_add_blocks() Kemeng Shi
2023-08-26 15:50 ` [PATCH v6 08/11] ext4: call ext4_mb_mark_context " Kemeng Shi
2023-09-01 9:50 ` Ritesh Harjani
2023-08-26 15:50 ` [PATCH v6 09/11] ext4: add some kunit stub for mballoc kunit test Kemeng Shi
2023-09-01 14:18 ` Ritesh Harjani
2023-08-26 15:50 ` [PATCH v6 10/11] ext4: add first unit test for ext4_mb_new_blocks_simple in mballoc Kemeng Shi
2023-09-01 14:29 ` Ritesh Harjani
2023-08-26 15:50 ` [PATCH v6 11/11] ext4: run mballoc test with different layouts setting Kemeng Shi
2023-09-01 14:36 ` Ritesh Harjani
2023-09-04 3:01 ` Kemeng Shi
2023-08-29 19:02 ` [PATCH v6 00/11] cleanups and unit test for mballoc Ritesh Harjani
2023-08-30 7:22 ` Kemeng Shi
2023-08-31 14:35 ` Ritesh Harjani [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87h6of8eko.fsf@doe.com \
--to=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
--cc=adilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shikemeng@huaweicloud.com \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.