Re: [RFC 1/3] ARM: Use normal types

[Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>]

Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> wrote:
> On Mon, May 15, 2023 at 10:44 AM Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, May 10, 2023 at 8:39 AM Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Someone has a good reason why this is not a good idea?
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
>>>
>>
>> Reviewed by:  Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com>
>>
>> This has been that way the bsd-user sources were reorganized in 2015. I
>> can find
>> no good reason in the FreeBSD sources to do this (we've been transitioning
>> from
>> the pre-standardized BSD convention of u_intXX_t -> uintXX_t for 25 years
>> now
>> it seems). I don't see any old or ancient usage as far back as I looked
>> why they'd
>> be different. Up through FreeBSD 12.x, this was u_int32_t (for all of
>> them), but
>> they switched to __uint32_t in FreeBSD 13 to avoid namespace pollution.
>>
>> tl;dr: change good, all should match.
>>
>
> Though a better commit message would be good. With that, I'll queue it to
> my branch.

I think your bit of history would be good O:-)

Later, Juan.