From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 03/22] drm/i915/bios: Use the copy of the LFP data table always
Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2022 13:36:01 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87h7755gfi.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220405173410.11436-4-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
On Tue, 05 Apr 2022, Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
>
> Currently get_lvds_fp_timing() still returns a pointer to the original
> data block rather than our copy. Let's convert the data pointer offsets
> to be relative to the data block rather than the whole BDB. With that
> we can make get_lvds_fp_timing() return a pointer to the copy.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c
> index 2e9f639d092e..000544280c35 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c
> @@ -191,6 +191,29 @@ static const struct {
> .min_size = sizeof(struct bdb_generic_dtd), },
> };
>
> +/* make the data table offsets relative to the data block */
> +static bool fixup_lfp_data_ptrs(const void *bdb, void *ptrs_block)
> +{
> + struct bdb_lvds_lfp_data_ptrs *ptrs = ptrs_block;
> + u32 offset;
> + int i;
> +
> + offset = block_offset(bdb, BDB_LVDS_LFP_DATA);
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < 16; i++) {
> + if (ptrs->ptr[i].fp_timing.offset < offset ||
> + ptrs->ptr[i].dvo_timing.offset < offset ||
> + ptrs->ptr[i].panel_pnp_id.offset < offset)
> + return false;
> +
> + ptrs->ptr[i].fp_timing.offset -= offset;
> + ptrs->ptr[i].dvo_timing.offset -= offset;
> + ptrs->ptr[i].panel_pnp_id.offset -= offset;
> + }
> +
> + return true;
> +}
> +
> static void
> init_bdb_block(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
> const void *bdb, enum bdb_block_id section_id,
> @@ -217,6 +240,13 @@ init_bdb_block(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
> drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm, "Found BDB block %d (size %zu, min size %zu)\n",
> section_id, block_size, min_size);
>
> + if (section_id == BDB_LVDS_LFP_DATA_PTRS &&
> + !fixup_lfp_data_ptrs(bdb, entry->data + 3)) {
> + drm_err(&i915->drm, "VBT has malformed LFP data table pointers\n");
> + kfree(entry);
> + return;
> + }
> +
> list_add_tail(&entry->node, &i915->vbt.bdb_blocks);
> }
>
> @@ -312,22 +342,19 @@ get_lvds_dvo_timing(const struct bdb_lvds_lfp_data *lvds_lfp_data,
> * this function may return NULL if the corresponding entry is invalid
> */
> static const struct lvds_fp_timing *
> -get_lvds_fp_timing(const struct bdb_header *bdb,
> - const struct bdb_lvds_lfp_data *data,
> +get_lvds_fp_timing(const struct bdb_lvds_lfp_data *data,
> const struct bdb_lvds_lfp_data_ptrs *ptrs,
> int index)
> {
> - size_t data_ofs = block_offset(bdb, BDB_LVDS_LFP_DATA);
> u16 data_size = ((const u16 *)data)[-1]; /* stored in header */
> size_t ofs;
>
> if (index >= ARRAY_SIZE(ptrs->ptr))
> return NULL;
> ofs = ptrs->ptr[index].fp_timing.offset;
> - if (ofs < data_ofs ||
> - ofs + sizeof(struct lvds_fp_timing) > data_ofs + data_size)
> + if (ofs + sizeof(struct lvds_fp_timing) > data_size)
> return NULL;
> - return (const struct lvds_fp_timing *)((const u8 *)bdb + ofs);
> + return (const struct lvds_fp_timing *)((const u8 *)data + ofs);
> }
>
> /* Parse general panel options */
> @@ -426,7 +453,7 @@ parse_lfp_panel_dtd(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
> "Found panel mode in BIOS VBT legacy lfp table: " DRM_MODE_FMT "\n",
> DRM_MODE_ARG(panel_fixed_mode));
>
> - fp_timing = get_lvds_fp_timing(bdb, lvds_lfp_data,
> + fp_timing = get_lvds_fp_timing(lvds_lfp_data,
> lvds_lfp_data_ptrs,
> panel_type);
> if (fp_timing) {
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-04-07 10:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 72+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-04-05 17:33 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 00/22] drm/i915/bios: Rework BDB block handling and PNPID->panel_type matching Ville Syrjala
2022-04-05 17:33 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 01/22] drm/i915/bios: Use the cached BDB version Ville Syrjala
2022-04-07 10:10 ` Jani Nikula
2022-04-05 17:33 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 02/22] drm/i915/bios: Make copies of VBT data blocks Ville Syrjala
2022-04-06 13:38 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 " Ville Syrjala
2022-04-07 10:23 ` Jani Nikula
2022-04-07 11:18 ` Ville Syrjälä
2022-04-07 12:06 ` Jani Nikula
2022-04-07 12:23 ` Ville Syrjälä
2022-04-05 17:33 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 03/22] drm/i915/bios: Use the copy of the LFP data table always Ville Syrjala
2022-04-07 10:36 ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2022-04-05 17:33 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 04/22] drm/i915/bios: Validate LFP data table pointers Ville Syrjala
2022-04-07 16:07 ` Jani Nikula
2022-04-05 17:33 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 05/22] drm/i915/bios: Trust the LFP data pointers Ville Syrjala
2022-04-07 16:12 ` Jani Nikula
2022-04-05 17:33 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 06/22] drm/i915/bios: Validate the panel_name table Ville Syrjala
2022-04-07 16:14 ` Jani Nikula
2022-04-05 17:33 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 07/22] drm/i915/bios: Reorder panel DTD parsing Ville Syrjala
2022-04-07 16:21 ` Jani Nikula
2022-04-08 13:59 ` Ville Syrjälä
2022-04-05 17:33 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 08/22] drm/i915/bios: Generate LFP data table pointers if the VBT lacks them Ville Syrjala
2022-04-06 13:39 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 " Ville Syrjala
2022-04-07 12:24 ` Jani Nikula
2022-04-07 12:29 ` Ville Syrjälä
2022-04-07 16:53 ` Jani Nikula
2022-04-07 18:18 ` Jani Nikula
2022-04-12 8:19 ` Ville Syrjälä
2022-04-05 17:33 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 09/22] drm/i915/bios: Get access to the tail end of the LFP data block Ville Syrjala
2022-04-06 13:40 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 " Ville Syrjala
2022-04-07 17:07 ` Jani Nikula
2022-04-08 14:04 ` Ville Syrjälä
2022-04-05 17:33 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 10/22] drm/i915/bios: Assume panel_type==0 if the VBT has bogus data Ville Syrjala
2022-04-07 17:11 ` Jani Nikula
2022-04-05 17:33 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 11/22] drm/i915/bios: Split parse_driver_features() into two parts Ville Syrjala
2022-04-07 17:13 ` Jani Nikula
2022-04-05 17:34 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 12/22] drm/i915/bios: Split VBT parsing to global vs. panel specific parts Ville Syrjala
2022-04-07 17:23 ` Jani Nikula
2022-04-08 14:09 ` Ville Syrjälä
2022-04-05 17:34 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 13/22] drm/i915/pps: Split PPS init+sanitize in two Ville Syrjala
2022-04-05 17:34 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 14/22] drm/i915/pps: Reinit PPS delays after VBT has been fully parsed Ville Syrjala
2022-04-05 17:34 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 15/22] drm/i915/bios: Do panel specific VBT parsing later Ville Syrjala
2022-04-06 19:05 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 " Ville Syrjala
2022-04-05 17:34 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 16/22] drm/i915/bios: Extract get_panel_type() Ville Syrjala
2022-04-07 17:26 ` Jani Nikula
2022-04-05 17:34 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 17/22] drm/i915/bios: Refactor panel_type code Ville Syrjala
2022-04-07 17:49 ` Jani Nikula
2022-04-08 14:13 ` Ville Syrjälä
2022-04-05 17:34 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 18/22] drm/i915/bios: Determine panel type via PNPID match Ville Syrjala
2022-04-06 19:09 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 " Ville Syrjala
2022-04-07 17:55 ` Jani Nikula
2022-04-08 14:51 ` Ville Syrjälä
2022-04-05 17:34 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 19/22] drm/i915/bios: Parse the seamless DRRS min refresh rate Ville Syrjala
2022-04-07 17:56 ` Jani Nikula
2022-04-05 17:34 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 20/22] drm/i915: Respect VBT " Ville Syrjala
2022-04-07 18:01 ` Jani Nikula
2022-04-05 17:34 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 21/22] drm/edid: Extract drm_edid_decode_mfg_id() Ville Syrjala
2022-04-05 17:34 ` Ville Syrjala
2022-04-07 18:02 ` [Intel-gfx] " Jani Nikula
2022-04-05 17:34 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 22/22] drm/i915/bios: Dump PNPID and panel name Ville Syrjala
2022-04-07 18:07 ` Jani Nikula
2022-04-08 14:52 ` Ville Syrjälä
2022-04-05 22:55 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915/bios: Rework BDB block handling and PNPID->panel_type matching Patchwork
2022-04-05 22:57 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2022-04-05 23:02 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.DOCS: " Patchwork
2022-04-05 23:27 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2022-04-06 18:17 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915/bios: Rework BDB block handling and PNPID->panel_type matching (rev4) Patchwork
2022-04-06 18:19 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2022-04-06 18:50 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2022-04-07 0:11 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915/bios: Rework BDB block handling and PNPID->panel_type matching (rev6) Patchwork
2022-04-07 0:14 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2022-04-07 0:44 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2022-04-07 8:37 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87h7755gfi.fsf@intel.com \
--to=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.