All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: Tong Zhang <ztong0001@gmail.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>,
	open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] genirq/msi: fix crash when handling Multi-MSI
Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2022 11:36:08 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87h7a28uhj.wl-maz@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAA5qM4CfExWdg=Gp8OshKgYsi0A82nzTA1Uqu6nc_MQmdBfWzg@mail.gmail.com>

Please avoid top-posting.

On Mon, 17 Jan 2022 10:10:13 +0000,
Tong Zhang <ztong0001@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Hello,
> 
> ops->msi_check could point to pci_msi_domain_check_cap that is the
> function in question
> 
> hence we can have following call stack
> 
> pci_msi_domain_check_cap (used by ops->msi_check(domain, info, dev))
> msi_domain_prepare_irqs
> __msi_domain_alloc_irqs
> msi_domain_alloc_irqs_descs_locked
> 
> What I am suggesting is commit 0f62d941acf9 changed how this return
> value is being handled and created a UAF

OK, this makes more sense.

But msi_domain_prepare_irqs() shouldn't fail in this case, and we
should proceed with the allocation of at least one vector, which isn't
happening here.

Also, if __msi_domain_alloc_irqs() is supposed to return the number of
irqs allocated, it isn't doing it consistently.

Thomas, can you shed some light on what is the intended behaviour
here?

Thanks,

	M.

-- 
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.

  reply	other threads:[~2022-01-17 11:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-01-17  9:27 [PATCH v1] genirq/msi: fix crash when handling Multi-MSI Tong Zhang
2022-01-17  9:59 ` Marc Zyngier
2022-01-17 10:10   ` Tong Zhang
2022-01-17 11:36     ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
2022-01-18 14:39       ` Thomas Gleixner
2022-01-19  0:44         ` Thomas Gleixner
2022-01-19 17:54           ` [PATCH] PCI/MSI: Prevent UAF in error path Thomas Gleixner
2022-01-19 18:37             ` Bjorn Helgaas
2022-01-19 18:54             ` Tong Zhang
2022-01-21  1:18             ` [tip: irq/urgent] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87h7a28uhj.wl-maz@kernel.org \
    --to=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=ztong0001@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.