From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FEB2C433F5 for ; Wed, 6 Oct 2021 11:54:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03F196113A for ; Wed, 6 Oct 2021 11:54:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S238124AbhJFL4P (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Oct 2021 07:56:15 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([170.10.133.124]:39258 "EHLO us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S238117AbhJFL4O (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Oct 2021 07:56:14 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1633521262; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=z3n781SEL+Kn3UomjzzL/ye4PJxJ0/lysVbmtVZ+Dws=; b=CFHuDJeZCeDqujHsZEJmmLnL4mGZinKrVe01LSBLMvXYSqyxZj8Gmo4VV5F812IEhEm/A2 L9GcmcbTovs+LadtCy2nZkQUN/b2ESbI5Kt4u3oDfdMAvrZhb+jHBjjy5pSQxl6ImOnjaU 3WsH8QQgmJ0qat3yE16G0WXv9/D+P10= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-574-aEExm3fYO5iHeDGh_1t3yw-1; Wed, 06 Oct 2021 07:54:19 -0400 X-MC-Unique: aEExm3fYO5iHeDGh_1t3yw-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2B952BBEE5; Wed, 6 Oct 2021 11:54:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (unknown [10.39.193.118]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49FCE60BE5; Wed, 6 Oct 2021 11:54:03 +0000 (UTC) From: Cornelia Huck To: Enrico Granata , Stefan Hajnoczi Cc: virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, hch@infradead.org Subject: Re: [virtio-dev] Fwd: [PATCH v2] Provide detailed specification of virtio-blk lifetime metrics In-Reply-To: Organization: Red Hat GmbH References: <20210505193655.2414268-1-egranata@google.com> <87pmvlck3p.fsf@redhat.com> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.32.1 (https://notmuchmail.org) Date: Wed, 06 Oct 2021 13:54:01 +0200 Message-ID: <87h7duz7vq.fsf@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.12 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-block@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Aug 06 2021, Enrico Granata wrote: > Hi folks, > I am back from my leave of absence, so thank you everyone for your patience > > This proposal has been outstanding for a while and didn't seem to > receive pushback, especially compared to the initial proposal > > Would it be the right time to put this modification up for a vote? I guess no news is good news? (Or it fell through the cracks for everybody...) I can update #106 and start voting. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Sender: List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Received: from lists.oasis-open.org (oasis-open.org [10.110.1.242]) by lists.oasis-open.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C85E986495 for ; Wed, 6 Oct 2021 11:54:21 +0000 (UTC) From: Cornelia Huck In-Reply-To: References: <20210505193655.2414268-1-egranata@google.com> <87pmvlck3p.fsf@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 06 Oct 2021 13:54:01 +0200 Message-ID: <87h7duz7vq.fsf@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [virtio-dev] Fwd: [PATCH v2] Provide detailed specification of virtio-blk lifetime metrics Content-Type: text/plain To: Enrico Granata , Stefan Hajnoczi Cc: virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, hch@infradead.org List-ID: On Fri, Aug 06 2021, Enrico Granata wrote: > Hi folks, > I am back from my leave of absence, so thank you everyone for your patience > > This proposal has been outstanding for a while and didn't seem to > receive pushback, especially compared to the initial proposal > > Would it be the right time to put this modification up for a vote? I guess no news is good news? (Or it fell through the cracks for everybody...) I can update #106 and start voting. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: virtio-dev-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org For additional commands, e-mail: virtio-dev-help@lists.oasis-open.org From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5DBEC433FE for ; Wed, 6 Oct 2021 11:54:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp3.osuosl.org (smtp3.osuosl.org [140.211.166.136]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 792D561154 for ; Wed, 6 Oct 2021 11:54:25 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail.kernel.org 792D561154 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lists.linux-foundation.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp3.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38BC5607D0; Wed, 6 Oct 2021 11:54:25 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org Received: from smtp3.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp3.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id I49BsddMzIvx; Wed, 6 Oct 2021 11:54:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.linuxfoundation.org (lf-lists.osuosl.org [IPv6:2605:bc80:3010:104::8cd3:938]) by smtp3.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D7D81607AE; Wed, 6 Oct 2021 11:54:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lf-lists.osuosl.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A70CFC0011; Wed, 6 Oct 2021 11:54:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp3.osuosl.org (smtp3.osuosl.org [140.211.166.136]) by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2131EC000D for ; Wed, 6 Oct 2021 11:54:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp3.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EC30607D0 for ; Wed, 6 Oct 2021 11:54:23 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org Received: from smtp3.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp3.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kedsuY2mFaya for ; Wed, 6 Oct 2021 11:54:22 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) by smtp3.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EE18D607AE for ; Wed, 6 Oct 2021 11:54:21 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1633521260; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=z3n781SEL+Kn3UomjzzL/ye4PJxJ0/lysVbmtVZ+Dws=; b=jCD288rln4edAhafZu9BRBpCS2l/xYABsvLrJ0nQZmSDVO+4+N4jjTWbmm0dqb1LefohGC 2zAXpORz8gv+TZuigiSjhkBKOeciiARGGB2k+hGYLL/6DawFm7N++ePPXWqCm207PtD7Q0 BO5jzySCdumBvCqz6QPP763jpq3qZNM= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-574-aEExm3fYO5iHeDGh_1t3yw-1; Wed, 06 Oct 2021 07:54:19 -0400 X-MC-Unique: aEExm3fYO5iHeDGh_1t3yw-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2B952BBEE5; Wed, 6 Oct 2021 11:54:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (unknown [10.39.193.118]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49FCE60BE5; Wed, 6 Oct 2021 11:54:03 +0000 (UTC) From: Cornelia Huck To: Enrico Granata , Stefan Hajnoczi Subject: Re: [virtio-dev] Fwd: [PATCH v2] Provide detailed specification of virtio-blk lifetime metrics In-Reply-To: Organization: Red Hat GmbH References: <20210505193655.2414268-1-egranata@google.com> <87pmvlck3p.fsf@redhat.com> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.32.1 (https://notmuchmail.org) Date: Wed, 06 Oct 2021 13:54:01 +0200 Message-ID: <87h7duz7vq.fsf@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.12 Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org, hch@infradead.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org X-BeenThere: virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux virtualization List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Sender: "Virtualization" On Fri, Aug 06 2021, Enrico Granata wrote: > Hi folks, > I am back from my leave of absence, so thank you everyone for your patience > > This proposal has been outstanding for a while and didn't seem to > receive pushback, especially compared to the initial proposal > > Would it be the right time to put this modification up for a vote? I guess no news is good news? (Or it fell through the cracks for everybody...) I can update #106 and start voting. _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization