From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Vinicius Costa Gomes Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2020 15:52:31 -0700 Subject: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH 1/2] igc: Fix wrong timestamp latency numbers In-Reply-To: <20200818143615.00000f16@intel.com> References: <20200817231231.2971207-1-vinicius.gomes@intel.com> <20200818143615.00000f16@intel.com> Message-ID: <87h7szr2hc.fsf@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: intel-wired-lan@osuosl.org List-ID: Jesse Brandeburg writes: > Vinicius Costa Gomes wrote: > >> The previous timestamping latency numbers were obtained by >> interpolating the i210 numbers with the i225 crystal clock value. That >> calculation was wrong. >> >> Use the correct values from real measurements. >> >> Signed-off-by: Vinicius Costa Gomes > > Is this targeted at net or net-next, and because it is a fix I > recommend you have subject > [PATCH net 1/2] Oh, sorry about that. I used the wrong 'git format-patch' line. > > and you should include a "Fixes:" tag since this driver has been > released in previous kernels. Yes. This should have been directed to 'net-queue', thanks for noticing. Will send a v2. Cheers, -- Vinicius