All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Toke Høiland-Jørgensen" <toke@redhat.com>
To: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
Cc: daniel@iogearbox.net, ast@fb.com, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, Xiumei Mu <xmu@redhat.com>,
	brouer@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf] cpumap: Avoid warning when CONFIG_DEBUG_PER_CPU_MAPS is enabled
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2020 10:23:29 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87h7xjn8ji.fsf@toke.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200416085537.65dde42e@carbon>

Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com> writes:

> On Wed, 15 Apr 2020 16:01:51 +0200
> Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> When the kernel is built with CONFIG_DEBUG_PER_CPU_MAPS, the cpumap code
>> can trigger a spurious warning if CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK is also set. This
>> happens because in this configuration, NR_CPUS can be larger than
>> nr_cpumask_bits, so the initial check in cpu_map_alloc() is not sufficient
>> to guard against hitting the warning in cpumask_check().
>> 
>> Fix this by using the nr_cpumask_bits variable in the map creation code
>> instead of the NR_CPUS constant.
>
> Shouldn't you use 'nr_cpu_ids' instead of 'nr_cpumask_bits' ?
>
> Else this will still fail on systems with CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK=n.

Jesper and I had an offlist discussion about this, and decided that it's
actually better to keep the check in cpu_map_alloc as-is, and instead
just check against nr_cpumask_bits in cpu_map_update_elem(). Otherwise,
the max-size of the map can vary between machines which can affect BPF
program portability.

I'll send a v2.

-Toke


      reply	other threads:[~2020-04-16  8:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-04-15 14:01 [PATCH bpf] cpumap: Avoid warning when CONFIG_DEBUG_PER_CPU_MAPS is enabled Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2020-04-16  6:55 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2020-04-16  8:23   ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87h7xjn8ji.fsf@toke.dk \
    --to=toke@redhat.com \
    --cc=ast@fb.com \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=brouer@redhat.com \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=xmu@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.