From: Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp>
To: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Cc: "Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@redhat.com>,
"Richard Henderson" <richard.henderson@linaro.org>,
"QEMU Developers" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] docs: Add RX target.
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2020 21:49:48 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87h7yw9xxv.wl-ysato@users.sourceforge.jp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFEAcA9aOFA7_Tpgvk9Q0yH16B1SLG5zfrU5ZftMsMJ0Zo9YPQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, 10 Mar 2020 20:54:16 +0900,
Peter Maydell wrote:
>
> On Tue, 10 Mar 2020 at 11:30, Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > On 3/9/20 11:28 PM, Yoshinori Sato wrote:
> >
> > >>> +++ b/docs/system/targets.rst
> > >>> @@ -17,3 +17,4 @@ Contents:
> > >>> target-arm
> > >>> target-m68k
> > >>> target-xtensa
> > >>> + target-rx
> > >>
> > >> Is it worth keeping this list alphabetically sorted?
> > >
> > > It was not in alphabetical order, it was added at the last. Is it better
> > > to arrange in alphabetical order?
> >
> > The 3 lines of context was alphabetical, but looking at the whole file,
> > the overall list is not. So sticking yours last is fine after all.
>
> In an ideal world the correct order would probably be
> "alphabetical order of the headline titles in the referenced
> files", so that the displayed ToC is alphabetized.
OK.
Change to alphabetical order.
> thanks
> -- PMM
--
Yosinori Sato
prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-03-10 12:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-03-08 13:06 [PATCH] docs: Add RX target Yoshinori Sato
2020-03-09 15:07 ` Eric Blake
2020-03-10 4:28 ` Yoshinori Sato
2020-03-10 11:29 ` Eric Blake
2020-03-10 11:54 ` Peter Maydell
2020-03-10 12:49 ` Yoshinori Sato [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87h7yw9xxv.wl-ysato@users.sourceforge.jp \
--to=ysato@users.sourceforge.jp \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=philmd@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.