diff for duplicates of <87h8dgefee.fsf@esperi.org.uk> diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt index 655d9b2..085c709 100644 --- a/a/1.txt +++ b/N1/1.txt @@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ stats_total/cache_readaheads: 0 Huge increase in bypassed reads, essentially no new cached reads. This is... basically the optimum case for bcache, and it's not caching it! -From my reading of xfs_dir2_leaf_readbuf(), it looks like essentially +>From my reading of xfs_dir2_leaf_readbuf(), it looks like essentially all directory reads in XFS appear to bcache as a single non-readahead followed by a pile of readahead I/O: bcache bypasses readahead bios, so all directory reads (or perhaps all directory reads larger than a single diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest index 534f089..53a5ec0 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N1/content_digest @@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ "Huge increase in bypassed reads, essentially no new cached reads. This\n" "is... basically the optimum case for bcache, and it's not caching it!\n" "\n" - "From my reading of xfs_dir2_leaf_readbuf(), it looks like essentially\n" + ">From my reading of xfs_dir2_leaf_readbuf(), it looks like essentially\n" "all directory reads in XFS appear to bcache as a single non-readahead\n" "followed by a pile of readahead I/O: bcache bypasses readahead bios, so\n" "all directory reads (or perhaps all directory reads larger than a single\n" @@ -59,4 +59,4 @@ "since bcache's primary raison d'etre is precisely to cache seeky stuff\n" like metadata. :( -6311383fcd7aee20109272ac6705bc99a64a7adcbcb9500e34cea562bc26aaaf +fd94fd51028a99143e59b79bffe045783b219357c3a7f7b27a048430e87558f9
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.