diff for duplicates of <87h8nospo5.fsf@xmission.com>

diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt
index c0937f3..463f4ab 100644
--- a/a/1.txt
+++ b/N1/1.txt
@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> writes:
 >> Am I missing something here?
 >
 > The kexec_file_load() calls kernel_read_file_from_fd(), which in turn
-> calls security_kernel_read_file().  So kexec_file_load and kexec_load
+> calls security_kernel_read_file().  So kexec_file_load and kexec_load
 > syscall would be using the same method for enforcing signature
 > verification.
 
@@ -39,9 +39,9 @@ kexec_load security hook.
 
 
 > This is independent of the architecture specific method for verifying
-> signatures.  The coordination between these two methods was included
+> signatures.  The coordination between these two methods was included
 > in the lockdown patch set, but is being removed, as well the gating of
-> kexec_load syscall.  Instead of being based on the lockdown flag, I
+> kexec_load syscall.  Instead of being based on the lockdown flag, I
 > assume the coordination between the two methods will reappear based on
 > a secure boot flag of some sort.
 
@@ -49,9 +49,3 @@ I was blind there for a moment.  Yes this is all about the ima xattrs
 allowing a file to be loaded.
 
 Eric
-
-
-_______________________________________________
-kexec mailing list
-kexec@lists.infradead.org
-http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest
index 41e6814..bb09d2e 100644
--- a/a/content_digest
+++ b/N1/content_digest
@@ -6,12 +6,12 @@
  "Subject\0Re: [PATCH 2/3] kexec: call LSM hook for kexec_load syscall\0"
  "Date\0Thu, 03 May 2018 10:51:38 -0500\0"
  "To\0Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>\0"
- "Cc\0kexec@lists.infradead.org"
-  linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
+ "Cc\0David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>"
   Matthew Garrett <mjg59@google.com>
-  David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
+  linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org
   linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org
- " linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org\0"
+  kexec@lists.infradead.org
+ " linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org\0"
  "\00:1\0"
  "b\0"
  "Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> writes:\n"
@@ -38,7 +38,7 @@
  ">> Am I missing something here?\n"
  ">\n"
  "> The kexec_file_load() calls kernel_read_file_from_fd(), which in turn\n"
- "> calls security_kernel_read_file(). \302\240So kexec_file_load and kexec_load\n"
+ "> calls security_kernel_read_file().  So kexec_file_load and kexec_load\n"
  "> syscall would be using the same method for enforcing signature\n"
  "> verification.\n"
  "\n"
@@ -55,21 +55,15 @@
  "\n"
  "\n"
  "> This is independent of the architecture specific method for verifying\n"
- "> signatures. \302\240The coordination between these two methods was included\n"
+ "> signatures.  The coordination between these two methods was included\n"
  "> in the lockdown patch set, but is being removed, as well the gating of\n"
- "> kexec_load syscall. \302\240Instead of being based on the lockdown flag, I\n"
+ "> kexec_load syscall.  Instead of being based on the lockdown flag, I\n"
  "> assume the coordination between the two methods will reappear based on\n"
  "> a secure boot flag of some sort.\n"
  "\n"
  "I was blind there for a moment.  Yes this is all about the ima xattrs\n"
  "allowing a file to be loaded.\n"
  "\n"
- "Eric\n"
- "\n"
- "\n"
- "_______________________________________________\n"
- "kexec mailing list\n"
- "kexec@lists.infradead.org\n"
- http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
+ Eric
 
-b66effab25e3f8a4ee9d62f8b8b04bce5b984b377d32d678c8d7ecafe4e5939c
+67250f6ecd64a33b6135910ab64b563df83e9e65f311946ee11499a06af96e38
