Re: [Qemu-devel] [PULL 00/27] Migration pull

["Alex Bennée" <alex.bennee@linaro.org>]

Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com> writes:

> Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org> wrote:
>> On 19 January 2018 at 16:43, Alexey Perevalov <a.perevalov@samsung.com> wrote:
>>> As I remember, I tested build in QEMU's docker build system,
>>> but now I checked it on i386 Ubuntu, and yes linker says about unresolved
>>> atomic symbols. Next week, I'll have a time to investigate it deeper.
>>
>> This sounds like exactly the problem I pointed out in a previous
>> round of this patchset :-(
>>
>> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2018-01/msg02103.html
>>
>> Ignoring comments and sending patches anyway makes me grumpy,
>> especially when the result is exactly "fails obscurely on
>> some architectures only"...
>
> It compiles for me.  F25 i686 gcc.  I did change it to use intptr_t
> instead of uint64_t.  So, I don't know what is going on here.
>
> Then, I have a report that clang -m32 didn't work (Mat).  I haven't been
> able yet to reproduce.  I don't have 32bits libraries installed on my
> x86_64 systems.  clang compiles for me on both 64 bits (f27) and 32bits
> native (f25, it is a long history that it is not f27).
>
> So, I can agree that we have to fix anything that don't work, but I
> can't agree that I didn't care about comments, at least I tried to fix
> the problems you pointed me to.
>
> What I don't have is an easier way of compiling on arm and ppc32, but I
> will search a way to do that for my pull requsets.

  make docker-test-build@debian-armhf-cross
  make docker-test-build@debian-powerpc-cross

Assuming you have docker setup and working.

>
> Sorry about the inconveniences.
>
> Later, Juan.


--
Alex Bennée