From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@virtuozzo.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the userns tree
Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2017 07:17:03 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87h8y79ubk.fsf@xmission.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170720132549.0f086e4a@canb.auug.org.au> (Stephen Rothwell's message of "Thu, 20 Jul 2017 13:25:49 +1000")
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> writes:
> Hi Eric,
>
> After merging the userns tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:
>
> kernel/pid_namespace.c: In function 'create_pid_namespace':
> kernel/pid_namespace.c:105:7: error: too many arguments to function 'in_userns'
> if (!in_userns(parent_pid_ns->user_ns, user_ns))
> ^
> In file included from kernel/pid_namespace.c:13:0:
> include/linux/user_namespace.h:148:20: note: declared here
> static inline bool in_userns(const struct user_namespace *target_ns)
> ^
>
> Caused by commit
>
> 1f1b28d80cd9 ("userns,pidns: Verify the userns for new pid namespaces")
>
> I have used the userns tree from next-20170719 for today.
*scratches my head*
Yes. That isn't a powerpc specific bug.
This has been in my for-testing branch forever. I thought this had
received plenty of build testing but apparently not.
I will get this sorted out.
Thank you very much.
Eric
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-07-20 12:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-07-20 3:25 linux-next: build failure after merge of the userns tree Stephen Rothwell
2017-07-20 12:17 ` Eric W. Biederman [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2022-03-16 5:56 Stephen Rothwell
2022-03-16 13:54 ` Eric W. Biederman
2021-12-17 7:34 Stephen Rothwell
2021-12-17 16:53 ` Eric W. Biederman
2021-12-17 7:13 Stephen Rothwell
2021-10-20 3:46 Stephen Rothwell
2021-10-20 16:00 ` Eric W. Biederman
2021-10-07 3:47 Stephen Rothwell
2021-10-07 18:56 ` Eric W. Biederman
2020-05-21 8:22 Stephen Rothwell
2018-03-28 7:41 Stephen Rothwell
2018-03-28 18:32 ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-01-26 1:05 Stephen Rothwell
2018-01-26 2:45 ` Eric W. Biederman
2015-05-25 10:39 Stephen Rothwell
2014-04-17 5:12 Stephen Rothwell
2014-04-17 7:18 ` Eric W. Biederman
2014-04-22 1:34 ` Stephen Rothwell
2014-04-22 1:34 ` Stephen Rothwell
2013-11-08 7:07 Stephen Rothwell
2013-11-08 23:15 ` Eric W. Biederman
2013-11-11 5:25 ` Stephen Rothwell
2013-11-11 5:25 ` Stephen Rothwell
2013-11-08 6:58 Stephen Rothwell
2013-11-08 7:27 ` Christoph Hellwig
2013-11-08 15:55 ` Al Viro
2013-11-08 22:50 ` Eric W. Biederman
2013-11-09 8:32 ` Christoph Hellwig
2012-09-24 12:18 Stephen Rothwell
2012-09-24 12:18 ` Stephen Rothwell
2012-05-21 7:50 Stephen Rothwell
2012-05-21 22:05 ` Eric W. Biederman
2012-05-14 9:13 Stephen Rothwell
2012-05-16 1:12 ` Eric W. Biederman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87h8y79ubk.fsf@xmission.com \
--to=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=ktkhai@virtuozzo.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.