From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52799) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cEIWS-0001cq-PI for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 06 Dec 2016 11:23:17 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cEIWP-0001Nm-LR for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 06 Dec 2016 11:23:16 -0500 Received: from mail-wj0-f171.google.com ([209.85.210.171]:32776) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cEIWP-0001Nf-Cx for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 06 Dec 2016 11:23:13 -0500 Received: by mail-wj0-f171.google.com with SMTP id xy5so327760245wjc.0 for ; Tue, 06 Dec 2016 08:23:13 -0800 (PST) References: <1479906121-12211-1-git-send-email-rth@twiddle.net> <1479906121-12211-20-git-send-email-rth@twiddle.net> From: Alex =?utf-8?Q?Benn=C3=A9e?= In-reply-to: <1479906121-12211-20-git-send-email-rth@twiddle.net> Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2016 16:22:10 +0000 Message-ID: <87h96hyqml.fsf@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 19/64] tcg/optimize: Fold movcond 0/1 into setcond List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Richard Henderson Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Richard Henderson writes: > Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson > --- > tcg/optimize.c | 15 +++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/tcg/optimize.c b/tcg/optimize.c > index f41ed2c..9e26bb7 100644 > --- a/tcg/optimize.c > +++ b/tcg/optimize.c > @@ -1105,6 +1105,21 @@ void tcg_optimize(TCGContext *s) > tcg_opt_gen_mov(s, op, args, args[0], args[4-tmp]); > break; > } > + if (temp_is_const(args[3]) && temp_is_const(args[4])) { > + tcg_target_ulong tv = temps[args[3]].val; > + tcg_target_ulong fv = temps[args[4]].val; > + TCGCond cond = args[5]; > + if (fv == 1 && tv == 0) { > + cond = tcg_invert_cond(cond); > + } else if (!(tv == 1 && fv == 0)) { > + goto do_default; > + } Why the weird exit early here on an inverted test. Couldn't it just be } else if (tv == 1 && fv == 0) { args[3] = cond; op->opc = opc = (opc == INDEX_op_movcond_i32 ? INDEX_op_setcond_i32 : INDEX_op_setcond_i64); nb_iargs = 2; } And fall through to the goto do_default as before? > goto do_default; > > case INDEX_op_add2_i32: -- Alex Bennée