All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nikolaus Rath <Nikolaus@rath.org>
To: fuse-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>
Subject: Difference between invalidating and deleting dentry
Date: Sat, 08 Oct 2016 21:37:59 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87h98mxhlk.fsf@vostro.rath.org> (raw)

Hello,

I just added an example to FUSE that illustrates use of the
fuse_lowlevel_notify_inval_entry() function. However, when writing it I
realized that I don't actually fully understand how this function
differs from fuse_lowlevel_notify_delete(). Could someone shed some
light on this?

Currently, the FUSE documentation says:

fuse_lowlevel_notify_inval_entry:
   Notify to invalidate parent attributes and the dentry matching
   parent/name

fuse_lowlevel_notify_delete:
   Notify to invalidate parent attributes and delete the dentry matching
   parent/name if the dentry's inode number matches child (otherwise it
   will invalidate the matching dentry).


But what exactly is the difference between deleting and invalidating a
dentry? In each case, isn't the resulting behavior the same, in that the
next time someone tries to access this (parent_inode,entry_name)
combination a lookup() request will be send to the FUSE process?


Thanks,
-Nikolaus

-- 
GPG encrypted emails preferred. Key id: 0xD113FCAC3C4E599F
Fingerprint: ED31 791B 2C5C 1613 AF38 8B8A D113 FCAC 3C4E 599F

             »Time flies like an arrow, fruit flies like a Banana.«

             reply	other threads:[~2016-10-09  5:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-10-09  4:37 Nikolaus Rath [this message]
2016-10-10  8:16 ` [fuse-devel] Difference between invalidating and deleting dentry Amir Goldstein
2016-10-10 15:45   ` Nikolaus Rath
2016-10-10 15:55     ` Michael Theall
2016-10-10 15:57       ` Amir Goldstein
2016-10-10 16:11         ` Michael Theall
2016-10-10 16:10       ` Nikolaus Rath
2016-10-19  1:51         ` Nikolaus Rath
2016-10-19  5:53           ` Amir Goldstein
2016-10-19  8:01             ` Miklos Szeredi
2016-10-19  8:32               ` Amir Goldstein
2016-10-19  8:38                 ` Miklos Szeredi
2016-10-19 21:00                   ` Nikolaus Rath
2016-10-19 20:55             ` [fuse-devel] " Nikolaus Rath
2016-10-31 14:36 ` John Muir
2016-11-01 20:21   ` Nikolaus Rath

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87h98mxhlk.fsf@vostro.rath.org \
    --to=nikolaus@rath.org \
    --cc=fuse-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.