From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: holgerschurig@gmail.com (Holger Schurig) Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2016 08:35:28 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 1/3] ARM: dts: imx6: add support for Ka-Ro electronics TX6S-8034 module In-Reply-To: <1452621710-15336-2-git-send-email-LW@KARO-electronics.de> ("Lothar \=\?utf-8\?Q\?Wa\=C3\=9Fmann\=22's\?\= message of "Tue, 12 Jan 2016 19:01:48 +0100") References: <1452621710-15336-1-git-send-email-LW@KARO-electronics.de> <1452621710-15336-2-git-send-email-LW@KARO-electronics.de> Message-ID: <87h9iigce7.fsf@gmail.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Lothar Wa?mann writes: > +/ { > + model = "Ka-Ro electronics TX6S-8034 Module"; > + compatible = "karo,imx6dl-tx6dl", "fsl,imx6dl"; > + timestamp = __DATE__, __TIME__; Is this needed or useful? There's a movement that aims to do "reproducible builds" ... being able to recompile an image and verify it against the supplied can be helpful for security audit purposes. > + display: display at di0 { > + compatible = "fsl,imx-parallel-display"; > + pinctrl-names = "default"; > + pinctrl-0 = <&pinctrl_disp0_1>; > + interface-pix-fmt = "rgb24"; > +// fsl,panel = <&lcd0_panel>; Probably not for upstream inclusion? From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Holger Schurig Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] ARM: dts: imx6: add support for Ka-Ro electronics TX6S-8034 module Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2016 08:35:28 +0100 Message-ID: <87h9iigce7.fsf@gmail.com> References: <1452621710-15336-1-git-send-email-LW@KARO-electronics.de> <1452621710-15336-2-git-send-email-LW@KARO-electronics.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1452621710-15336-2-git-send-email-LW-bxm8fMRDkQLDiMYJYoSAnRvVK+yQ3ZXh@public.gmane.org> ("Lothar \=\?utf-8\?Q\?Wa\=C3\=9Fmann\=22's\?\= message of "Tue, 12 Jan 2016 19:01:48 +0100") Sender: devicetree-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Lothar =?utf-8?Q?Wa=C3=9Fmann?= Cc: Ian Campbell , Kumar Gala , Mark Rutland , Pawel Moll , Rob Herring , Russell King , Sascha Hauer , Shawn Guo , devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Lothar Wa=C3=9Fmann writes: > +/ { > + model =3D "Ka-Ro electronics TX6S-8034 Module"; > + compatible =3D "karo,imx6dl-tx6dl", "fsl,imx6dl"; > + timestamp =3D __DATE__, __TIME__; Is this needed or useful? There's a movement that aims to do "reproducible builds" ... being able to recompile an image and verify it against the supplied can be helpful for security audit purposes. > + display: display@di0 { > + compatible =3D "fsl,imx-parallel-display"; > + pinctrl-names =3D "default"; > + pinctrl-0 =3D <&pinctrl_disp0_1>; > + interface-pix-fmt =3D "rgb24"; > +// fsl,panel =3D <&lcd0_panel>; Probably not for upstream inclusion? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" i= n the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752363AbcAMHfe (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Jan 2016 02:35:34 -0500 Received: from mail-wm0-f66.google.com ([74.125.82.66]:35552 "EHLO mail-wm0-f66.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750752AbcAMHfc convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Jan 2016 02:35:32 -0500 From: Holger Schurig To: Lothar =?utf-8?Q?Wa=C3=9Fmann?= Cc: Ian Campbell , Kumar Gala , Mark Rutland , Pawel Moll , Rob Herring , Russell King , Sascha Hauer , Shawn Guo , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] ARM: dts: imx6: add support for Ka-Ro electronics TX6S-8034 module In-Reply-To: <1452621710-15336-2-git-send-email-LW@KARO-electronics.de> ("Lothar \=\?utf-8\?Q\?Wa\=C3\=9Fmann\=22's\?\= message of "Tue, 12 Jan 2016 19:01:48 +0100") References: <1452621710-15336-1-git-send-email-LW@KARO-electronics.de> <1452621710-15336-2-git-send-email-LW@KARO-electronics.de> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4 (gnu/linux) Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2016 08:35:28 +0100 Message-ID: <87h9iigce7.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Lothar Waßmann writes: > +/ { > + model = "Ka-Ro electronics TX6S-8034 Module"; > + compatible = "karo,imx6dl-tx6dl", "fsl,imx6dl"; > + timestamp = __DATE__, __TIME__; Is this needed or useful? There's a movement that aims to do "reproducible builds" ... being able to recompile an image and verify it against the supplied can be helpful for security audit purposes. > + display: display@di0 { > + compatible = "fsl,imx-parallel-display"; > + pinctrl-names = "default"; > + pinctrl-0 = <&pinctrl_disp0_1>; > + interface-pix-fmt = "rgb24"; > +// fsl,panel = <&lcd0_panel>; Probably not for upstream inclusion?