From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rusty Russell Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/6] virtio_balloon: transitional interface Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2015 19:53:14 +1030 Message-ID: <87h9t06w3h.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> References: <1427831230-28044-1-git-send-email-mst@redhat.com> <1427831230-28044-2-git-send-email-mst@redhat.com> <87mw2sy0fo.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> <20150401094236-mutt-send-email-mst@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20150401094236-mutt-send-email-mst@redhat.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Errors-To: virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org List-Id: virtualization@lists.linuxfoundation.org "Michael S. Tsirkin" writes: > On Wed, Apr 01, 2015 at 02:17:23PM +1030, Rusty Russell wrote: >> I would leave the device *exactly* as is, ugly structure packing and >> all. > > But why? It's going to be used for years, might as well make it clean? Because the only spec which currently exists says to do that. We do need a new virtio memballoon spec, but it'll look nothing like this anyway. Cheers, Rusty.