From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: OGAWA Hirofumi Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] fat: add fat_fallocate operation Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2013 22:50:12 +0900 Message-ID: <87hac2yga3.fsf@devron.myhome.or.jp> References: <1381329640-11871-1-git-send-email-linkinjeon@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, a.sahrawat@samsung.com, Namjae Jeon To: Namjae Jeon Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1381329640-11871-1-git-send-email-linkinjeon@gmail.com> (Namjae Jeon's message of "Wed, 9 Oct 2013 23:40:40 +0900") Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org Namjae Jeon writes: > diff --git a/fs/fat/inode.c b/fs/fat/inode.c > index 578a5db..2211489 100644 > --- a/fs/fat/inode.c > +++ b/fs/fat/inode.c > @@ -491,6 +491,13 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(fat_build_inode); > > static void fat_evict_inode(struct inode *inode) > { > + struct super_block *sb = inode->i_sb; > + > + /* Release unwritten fallocated blocks on file release. */ > + if (round_up(inode->i_size, sb->s_blocksize) < > + MSDOS_I(inode)->i_disksize && inode->i_nlink != 0) > + fat_truncate_blocks(inode, inode->i_size); > + > truncate_inode_pages(&inode->i_data, 0); > if (!inode->i_nlink) { > inode->i_size = 0; This would be better to move after truncate_inode_pages(). And as part of "else". if (!inode->i_nlink) { ... } else { /* here */ } And inode->i_size should be ->mmu_private? -- OGAWA Hirofumi