From: Peter Korsgaard <jacmet@uclibc.org>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [autobuild.buildroot.net] Build results for 2013-09-19
Date: Sat, 21 Sep 2013 07:19:37 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87hadebvkm.fsf@dell.be.48ers.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130921054145.52b70d5e@skate> (Thomas Petazzoni's message of "Sat, 21 Sep 2013 05:41:45 +0200")
>>>>> "Thomas" == Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com> writes:
Thomas> Hello,
Thomas> On Fri, 20 Sep 2013 08:30:08 +0200 (CEST), Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
>> arc | host-gcc-initial-4.8-arc | NOK | http://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/ff903ce970ea652cc1aa57a5eb57e923dc4c5405/
>> arc | host-gcc-initial-4.8-arc | NOK | http://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/d3b2e4e32d531c08c19d39b248898fe462b81d8f/
>> arc | host-gcc-initial-4.8-arc | NOK | http://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/76a2ab46ef7183f14eec944db4a598325e00b503/
Thomas> Hum, apparently on ARC, building libgcc requires having the C library
Thomas> headers. So, due to the change to build gcc in two passes instead of
Thomas> three, we're building libgcc in the first pass, before the C library is
Thomas> built, causing (I believe) the above failure. Mischa, if you have any
Thomas> insights about this, I'm interested :)
Thomas> Considering this problem, and the other SSP problems, I'm starting to
Thomas> wonder if my patch that changes the toolchain build mechanism to use
Thomas> two passes instead of three shouldn't be reverted for now, until I find
Thomas> the time to investigate all the problems that it is causing.
I'm thinking the same. Will you have time to work on it in the next week
or so? Otherwise I think we should revert for now.
--
Bye, Peter Korsgaard
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-09-21 5:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-09-20 6:30 [Buildroot] [autobuild.buildroot.net] Build results for 2013-09-19 Thomas Petazzoni
2013-09-20 8:29 ` Michael Rommel
2013-09-20 9:09 ` Peter Korsgaard
2013-09-20 9:23 ` Michael Rommel
2013-09-21 1:29 ` Matt Weber
2013-09-25 19:41 ` Matt Weber
2013-09-21 3:37 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-09-21 3:41 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-09-21 5:19 ` Peter Korsgaard [this message]
2013-09-21 7:41 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-09-24 13:56 ` Mischa Jonker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87hadebvkm.fsf@dell.be.48ers.dk \
--to=jacmet@uclibc.org \
--cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.